» Articles » PMID: 36993144

Feast to Famine: Sympatric Predators Respond Differently to Seasonal Prey Scarcity on the Low Arctic Tundra

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2023 Mar 30
PMID 36993144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resource fluctuation is a major driver of animal movement, influencing strategic choices such as residency vs nomadism, or social dynamics. The Arctic tundra is characterized by strong seasonality: Resources are abundant during the short summers but scarce in winters. Therefore, expansion of boreal-forest species onto the tundra raises questions on how they cope with winter-resource scarcity. We examined a recent incursion by red foxes () onto the coastal tundra of northern Manitoba, an area historically occupied by Arctic foxes () that lacks access to anthropogenic foods, and compared seasonal shifts in space use of the two species. We used 4 years of telemetry data following 8 red foxes and 11 Arctic foxes to test the hypothesis that the movement tactics of both species are primarily driven by temporal variability of resources. We also predicted that the harsh tundra conditions in winter would drive red foxes to disperse more often and maintain larger home ranges year-round than Arctic foxes, which are adapted to this environment. Dispersal was the most frequent winter movement tactic in both fox species, despite its association with high mortality (winter mortality was 9.4 times higher in dispersers than residents). Red foxes consistently dispersed toward the boreal forest, whereas Arctic foxes primarily used sea ice to disperse. Home range size of red and Arctic foxes did not differ in summer, but resident red foxes substantially increased their home range size in winter, whereas home range size of resident Arctic foxes did not change seasonally. As climate changes, abiotic constraints on some species may relax, but associated declines in prey communities may lead to local extirpation of many predators, notably by favoring dispersal during resource scarcity.

Citing Articles

Intraseasonal variations in the spatial behaviour of an Arctic predator.

Bonnefond L, Pinaud D, Bollache L, Schmidt N, Lang J, Hansen L Mov Ecol. 2025; 13(1):13.

PMID: 40038802 PMC: 11881417. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00522-5.


Migratory-derived resources induce elongated food chains through middle-up food web effects.

Moccetti C, Sperlich N, Saboret G, Ten Brink H, Brodersen J Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):56.

PMID: 39164695 PMC: 11337878. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00496-4.


Coexistence of two sympatric predators in a transitional ecosystem under constraining environmental conditions: a perspective from space and habitat use.

Warret Rodrigues C, Roth J Mov Ecol. 2023; 11(1):60.

PMID: 37784160 PMC: 10544556. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-023-00421-1.


Feast to famine: Sympatric predators respond differently to seasonal prey scarcity on the low Arctic tundra.

Warret Rodrigues C, Roth J Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(3):e9951.

PMID: 36993144 PMC: 10041551. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9951.

References
1.
Tape K, Christie K, Carroll G, ODonnell J . Novel wildlife in the Arctic: the influence of changing riparian ecosystems and shrub habitat expansion on snowshoe hares. Glob Chang Biol. 2015; 22(1):208-19. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13058. View

2.
Lofgren O, Hornfeldt B, Carlsson B . Site tenacity and nomadism in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus (L.)) in relation to cyclic food production. Oecologia. 2017; 69(3):321-326. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377051. View

3.
Lyons A, Turner W, Getz W . Home range plus: a space-time characterization of movement over real landscapes. Mov Ecol. 2015; 1(1):2. PMC: 4337754. DOI: 10.1186/2051-3933-1-2. View

4.
Fauteux D, Gauthier G, Berteaux D . Seasonal demography of a cyclic lemming population in the Canadian Arctic. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84(5):1412-22. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12385. View

5.
Barraquand F, Benhamou S . Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. Ecology. 2009; 89(12):3336-48. DOI: 10.1890/08-0162.1. View