The Roles of the Dietitian in an 18-week Telephone and Mobile Application Nutrition Intervention for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: a Qualitative Analysis

Overview

Journal Support Care Cancer

Specialties Critical Care
Oncology

Date 2023 Mar 28

PMID 36977801

Authors

Sharni Testa

Kate Furness

Tammie Choi

Terry Haines

Catherine E Huggins

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the patient-dietitian experience during an 18-week nutrition counselling intervention delivered using the telephone and a mobile application to people newly diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer to (1) elucidate the roles of the dietitian during intervention delivery and (2) explore unmet needs impacting nutritional intake.

Methods: Qualitative case study methodology was followed, whereby the case was the 18-week nutrition counselling intervention. Dietary counselling conversations and post-intervention interviews were inductively coded from six case participants which included fifty-one telephone conversations (17 h), 244 written messages, and four interviews. Data were coded inductively, and themes constructed. The coding framework was subsequently applied to all post-study interviews (n = 20) to explore unmet needs.

Results: Themes describing the roles of the dietitian were as follows: regular collaborative problem-solving to encourage empowerment, a reassuring care navigator including anticipatory guidance, and rapport building via psychosocial support. Psychosocial support included provision of empathy, reliable care provision, and delivery of positive perspective. Despite intensive counselling from the dietitian, nutrition impact symptom management was a core unmet need as it required intervention beyond the scope of practice for the dietitian.

Conclusion: Delivery of nutrition care via the telephone or an asynchronous mobile application to people with newly diagnosed UGI cancer required the dietitian to adopt a range of roles to influence nutritional intake: they empower people, act as care navigators, and provide psychosocial support. Limitations in dietitians' scope of practice identified unmet patient's needs in nutrition impact symptom management, which requires medication management.

Trial Registration: 27th January 2017 Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12617000152325).

Citing Articles

Factors associated with multimodal care practices for cancer cachexia among registered dietitians.

Amano K, Koshimoto S, Arakawa S, Oyamada S, Ishiki H, Morita T Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(4):213.

PMID: 38446230 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08417-2.

References

Silvers M, Savva J, Huggins C, Truby H, Haines T . Potential benefits of early nutritional intervention in adults with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a pilot randomised trial. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(11):3035-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2311-3. View

Lorton C, Griffin O, Higgins K, Roulston F, Stewart G, Gough N . Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice. Support Care Cancer. 2019; 28(5):2351-2360. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05042-2. View

Furness K, Huggins C, Hanna L, Silvers M, Cashin P, Low L . A process and mechanism of action evaluation of the effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: a study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):1181. PMC: 6262954. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5089-8. View

Johnson E, Frias J, Trujillo J . Anticipatory guidance in type 2 diabetes to improve disease management; next steps after basal insulin. Postgrad Med. 2018; 130(4):365-374. DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2018.1452515. View

Hanna L, Huggins C, Furness K, Silvers M, Savva J, Frawley H . Effect of early and intensive nutrition care, delivered via telephone or mobile application, on quality of life in people with upper gastrointestinal cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):707. PMC: 6029372. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4595-z. View

Rand L, Dunn M, Slade I, Upadhyaya S, Sheehan M . Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019; 17:20. PMC: 6757378. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-019-0188-1. View

Van Cutsem E, Arends J . The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006; 9 Suppl 2:S51-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.007. View

McMullen L . Oncology nurse navigators and the continuum of cancer care. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013; 29(2):105-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2013.02.005. View

Andreyev H, Norman A, Oates J, Cunningham D . Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?. Eur J Cancer. 1998; 34(4):503-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10090-9. View

10.

Rozga M, Handu D, Kelley K, Jimenez E, Martin H, Schofield M . Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Registered Dietitian Nutritionists. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021; 121(12):2524-2535. PMC: 7834621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.009. View

11.

Aujoulat I, Dhoore W, Deccache A . Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 66(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. View

12.

Furness K, Huggins C, Truby H, Croagh D, Haines T . Attitudes of Australian Patients Undergoing Treatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers to Different Models of Nutrition Care Delivery: Qualitative Investigation. JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(3):e23979. PMC: 7998321. DOI: 10.2196/23979. View

13.

Hazzard E, Walton K, McMahon A, Milosavljevic M, Tapsell L . Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the role of dietitians within multidisciplinary head and neck cancer teams: A qualitative multi-site study. Nutr Diet. 2021; 78(5):506-515. DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12664. View

14.

Rocque G, Pisu M, Jackson B, Kvale E, Demark-Wahnefried W, Martin M . Resource Use and Medicare Costs During Lay Navigation for Geriatric Patients With Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(6):817-825. PMC: 5540048. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307. View

15.

Rocque G, Partridge E, Pisu M, Martin M, Demark-Wahnefried W, Acemgil A . The Patient Care Connect Program: Transforming Health Care Through Lay Navigation. J Oncol Pract. 2016; 12(6):e633-42. PMC: 5702802. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008896. View

16.

Huggins C, Hanna L, Furness K, Silvers M, Savva J, Frawley H . Effect of Early and Intensive Telephone or Electronic Nutrition Counselling Delivered to People with Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer on Quality of Life: A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2022; 14(15). PMC: 9370208. DOI: 10.3390/nu14153234. View

17.

Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W . The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46(1):81-95. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6. View

18.

Rotteau L, Albert M, Bhattacharyya O, Berta W, Webster F . Understanding decisions to scale up: a qualitative case study of three health service intervention evaluations. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020; 26(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1177/1355819620921892. View

19.

Alpay L, Blanson Henkemans O, Otten W, Rovekamp T, Dumay A . E-health applications and services for patient empowerment: directions for best practices in The Netherlands. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(7):787-91. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0156. View

20.

Fitch M . Supportive care framework. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2008; 18(1):6-24. DOI: 10.5737/1181912x181614. View