» Articles » PMID: 20815745

E-health Applications and Services for Patient Empowerment: Directions for Best Practices in The Netherlands

Overview
Date 2010 Sep 7
PMID 20815745
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: E-health may enable the empowerment process for patients, particularly the chronically ill. However, e-health is not always designed with the requirements of patient empowerment in mind. Drawing on evidence-based e-health studies, we propose directions for best practices to develop e-health that promotes patient empowerment.

Methods: The concept of patient empowerment in the Dutch setting is discussed first. The prerequisites for patient empowerment are then described and translated into empowerment areas relevant to e-health.

Materials: We reviewed Dutch e-health studies that provide insights into what works, and what does not, in e-health.

Results: On the basis of the lessons learned from the studies, we propose directions for best practices to develop e-health that promotes patient empowerment. These directions cover various aspects, such as the design and implementation of e-health, its information content and usability, awareness, and acceptance. The studies also indicate the difficulty of establishing that e-health is really dedicated to patient empowerment.

Conclusions: Despite the body of knowledge about patient empowerment, as well as the technological visibility of e-health, evidence for best practices in general and for patient empowerment in particular is scarce. We call for a more systematic evaluation of e-health for patient empowerment and more reliable evidence. Beyond the organizational and technical issues involved in e-health, there is also a need to demonstrate its practical benefits to patients. The Netherlands is active in developing sustainable e-health. National initiatives are now in place to support the processes with the aim of establishing the required evidence-based best practices.

Citing Articles

Development of an evidence-informed implementation strategy for a digital supportive care platform for brain tumour patients, their carers and healthcare professionals.

Schadewaldt V, OBrien T, Kalla M, Krishnasamy M, Burns K, Bray S Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251316713.

PMID: 39949847 PMC: 11822819. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251316713.


Assessing Patient Use of and Attitudes toward eHealth Services for Communication with Primary Care Centers in Saudi Arabia and Factors Affecting Usage.

Alessa T, Alhussaini K, de Witte L Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(19).

PMID: 39408109 PMC: 11475504. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12191929.


Intention to use patient portal and its predictors among patient with diabetes in Amhara region referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023: UTAUT-2 model.

Wubete Abebe A, Tilahun B, Mekonnen Z, Tegegne M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241277177.

PMID: 39347512 PMC: 11428164. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277177.


Process evaluation of the implementation of the assessment of burden of chronic conditions tool in Dutch primary care - lessons from a qualitative implementation study.

Claessens D, Vervloet M, Boudewijns E, Keijsers L, Gidding-Slok A, van Schayck O BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):827.

PMID: 39033106 PMC: 11264986. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11270-y.


The roles of the dietitian in an 18-week telephone and mobile application nutrition intervention for upper gastrointestinal cancer: a qualitative analysis.

Testa S, Furness K, Choi T, Haines T, Huggins C Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(4):245.

PMID: 36977801 PMC: 10049904. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07684-9.