Predicting the Trajectories of Parents' Relationship Well-Being During COVID-19 Lockdowns and Beyond: a Vulnerability, Stress and Adaptation Model Perspective

Overview

Journal Prev Sci

Specialty Science

Date 2023 Mar 28

PMID 36976437

Authors

Gery C Karantzas

John W Toumbourou

Laura Knox

Christopher C Greenwood

Elizabeth M Westrupp

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Strict lockdowns have been employed by many of the world's nations as a public health response to COVID-19. However, concerns have been expressed as to how such public health responses disturb the human ecosystem. In this paper, we report on findings from a longitudinal study of Australian parents in which we investigated how state differences in government-mandated lockdowns affect the relationship well-being (i.e., relationship satisfaction and loneliness) of parents. We situated the study of the relational effects of strict lockdowns within the Vulnerability Stress Adaptation Model (VSAM, Karney & Bradbury, 1995) that considers the role of parents' pre-existing vulnerabilities (i.e., psychological distress and attachment insecurity), life stressors (pre-pandemic and COVID-19 stressors), and adaptive relationship processes (constructive communication and perceived partner support). A total of 1942 parents completed 14 waves of assessments of relationship satisfaction and loneliness over a 13.5-month period as well as baseline assessments of personal vulnerabilities, life stressors, and adaptive relationship processes. Parents with high relationship adaptations and low vulnerabilities evidenced the highest relationship well-being (i.e., high satisfaction and low loneliness) during changes in lockdown restrictions, while parents with moderate relationship adaptations and vulnerabilities experienced the poorest well-being. Differences in state lockdown restrictions (i.e., Victoria [long and strict lockdown policy] vs all other states) were associated with differences in relationship well-being for parents with high relationship adaptations. Specifically, Victorian parents experienced significant declines in relationship well-being compared to non-Victorian parents. Our findings provide novel insights into how government-mandated social restrictions can disrupt the relational ecology of parents.

References

Braithwaite S, Holt-Lunstad J . Romantic relationships and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 13:120-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001. View

Brugha T, Cragg D . The List of Threatening Experiences: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990; 82(1):77-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.x. View

Cutrona C, Russell D . Autonomy promotion, responsiveness, and emotion regulation promote effective social support in times of stress. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 13:126-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.07.002. View

Doss B, Rhoades G . The transition to parenthood: impact on couples' romantic relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 13:25-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.003. View

Fancourt D, Steptoe A, Bu F . Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 8(2):141-149. PMC: 7820109. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30482-X. View

Feeney B, Thrush R . Relationship influences on exploration in adulthood: the characteristics and function of a secure base. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(1):57-76. PMC: 2805473. DOI: 10.1037/a0016961. View

Fraley R, Heffernan M, Vicary A, Brumbaugh C . The Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychol Assess. 2011; 23(3):615-25. DOI: 10.1037/a0022898. View

Fraley R, Waller N, Brennan K . An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 78(2):350-65. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350. View

Fredman S, Monson C, Schumm J, Adair K, Taft C, Resick P . Associations among disaster exposure, intimate relationship adjustment, and PTSD symptoms: can disaster exposure enhance a relationship?. J Trauma Stress. 2010; 23(4):446-51. PMC: 2956072. DOI: 10.1002/jts.20555. View

10.

Hammen C . Generation of stress in the course of unipolar depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991; 100(4):555-61. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.4.555. View

11.

Karantzas G, Feeney J, Agnew C, Christensen A, Cutrona C, Doss B . Dealing with loss in the face of disasters and crises: Integrating interpersonal theories of couple adaptation and functioning. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021; 43:129-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.019. View

12.

Karantzas G, Feeney J, Goncalves C, McCabe M . Towards an integrative attachment-based model of relationship functioning. Br J Psychol. 2014; 105(3):413-34. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12047. View

13.

Karney B, Bradbury T . The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychol Bull. 1995; 118(1):3-34. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3. View

14.

Maisel N, Karney B . Socioeconomic status moderates associations among stressful events, mental health, and relationship satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2012; 26(4):654-60. DOI: 10.1037/a0028901. View

15.

McRae C, Overall N, Henderson A, Low R, Chang V . Parents' distress and poor parenting during a COVID-19 lockdown: The buffering effects of partner support and cooperative coparenting. Dev Psychol. 2021; 57(10):1623-1632. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001207. View

16.

Neff L, Karney B . Acknowledging the Elephant in the Room: How Stressful Environmental Contexts Shape Relationship Dynamics. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016; 13:107-110. PMC: 5067079. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013. View

17.

Overall N, McNulty J . What Type of Communication during Conflict is Beneficial for Intimate Relationships?. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016; 13:1-5. PMC: 5181851. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002. View

18.

Pietromonaco P, Overall N . Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships. Am Psychol. 2020; 76(3):438-450. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000714. View

19.

Pietromonaco P, Overall N . Implications of social isolation, separation, and loss during the COVID-19 pandemic for couples' relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021; 43:189-194. PMC: 8881098. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.014. View

20.

Randall A, Bodenmann G . Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 13:96-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.010. View