Acknowledging the Elephant in the Room: How Stressful Environmental Contexts Shape Relationship Dynamics

Overview

Journal Curr Opin Psychol

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Psychology

Date 2016 Oct 22

PMID 27766285

Citations 43

Authors

Lisa A Neff

Benjamin R Karney

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Compared to affluent marriages, lower income marriages develop within a context filled with negative stressors that may prove quite toxic for marital stability. The current paper argues that stressful contexts may undermine marital well-being through two routes. First, external stressors create additional problems within the marriage by diverting time and attention away from activities that promote intimacy between partners. Second, external stress may render spouses ill-equipped to cope with this increase in problems by draining spouses of the energy and resources necessary for responding to marital challenges in a constructive manner. In acknowledging the role of the marital context for relationship dynamics, this model suggests new directions for interventions designed to strengthen the marriages of lower income couples.

Citing Articles

In contact with grief: Affectionate touch and intimacy in bereaved parents.

Ergun T, Buyukcan-Tetik A, Debrot A, Schut H, Stroebe M Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025; 24(4):100534.

PMID: 39759572 PMC: 11699208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100534.

Love as a Commitment Device : Evidence from a Cross-Cultural Study across 90 Countries.

Kowal M, Bode A, Koszalkowska K, Roberts S, Gjoneska B, Frederick D Hum Nat. 2024; 35(4):430-450.

PMID: 39725786 PMC: 11836147. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-024-09482-6.

Exploring the factors contributing to parent stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: An ABC-X model approach.

Brik A, Wang Y Fam Process. 2024; 64(1):e13063.

PMID: 39334528 PMC: 11786249. DOI: 10.1111/famp.13063.

Examining Dyadic Stress Appraisal Processes Within Romantic Relationships from a Challenge and Threat Perspective.

Peters B, Overall N, Gresham A, Tudder A, Chang V, Reis H Affect Sci. 2024; 5(2):69-81.

PMID: 39050040 PMC: 11264650. DOI: 10.1007/s42761-024-00235-3.

Evaluation of Traditional Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.

Whitton S, Welge J, Newcomb M Psychol Violence. 2024; 13(6):456-467.

PMID: 38962161 PMC: 11218919. DOI: 10.1037/vio0000486.

References

Williamson H, Karney B, Bradbury T . Financial strain and stressful events predict newlyweds' negative communication independent of relationship satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2013; 27(1):65-75. PMC: 3667200. DOI: 10.1037/a0031104. View

Masarik A, Martin M, Ferrer E, Lorenz F, Conger K, Conger R . Couple Resilience to Economic Pressure Over Time and Across Generations. J Marriage Fam. 2016; 78(2):326-345. PMC: 4806389. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12284. View

Falconier M, Nussbeck F, Bodenmann G, Schneider H, Bradbury T . Stress from daily hassles in couples: its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being. J Marital Fam Ther. 2014; 41(2):221-35. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12073. View

Buck A, Neff L . Stress spillover in early marriage: the role of self-regulatory depletion. J Fam Psychol. 2012; 26(5):698-708. DOI: 10.1037/a0029260. View

Randall A, Bodenmann G . The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(2):105-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004. View

Story L, Repetti R . Daily occupational stressors and marital behavior. J Fam Psychol. 2006; 20(4):690-700. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.690. View

Brock R, Lawrence E . Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual risk factors for overprovision of partner support in marriage. J Fam Psychol. 2013; 28(1):54-64. DOI: 10.1037/a0035280. View

Neff L, Karney B . Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(3):435-50. DOI: 10.1037/a0015663. View

Johnson M . Healthy marriage initiatives: on the need for empiricism in policy implementation. Am Psychol. 2012; 67(4):296-308. DOI: 10.1037/a0027743. View

10.

Milek A, Butler E, Bodenmann G . The interplay of couple's shared time, women's intimacy, and intradyadic stress. J Fam Psychol. 2015; 29(6):831-42. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000133. View

11.

Cutrona C, Russell D, Abraham W, Gardner K, Melby J, Bryant C . Neighborhood Context and Financial Strain as Predictors of Marital Interaction and Marital Quality in African American Couples. Pers Relatsh. 2007; 10(3):389-409. PMC: 2040070. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6811.00056. View

12.

Jackson G, Kennedy D, Bradbury T, Karney B . A Social Network Comparison of Low-Income Black and White Newlywed Couples. J Marriage Fam. 2014; 76(5):967-982. PMC: 4157685. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12137. View

13.

Hagger M, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis N . Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(4):495-525. DOI: 10.1037/a0019486. View

14.

Feeney B, Lemay Jr E . Surviving relationship threats: the role of emotional capital. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012; 38(8):1004-17. DOI: 10.1177/0146167212442971. View

15.

Campos B, Graesch A, Repetti R, Bradbury T, Ochs E . Opportunity for interaction? A naturalistic observation study of dual-earner families after work and school. J Fam Psychol. 2009; 23(6):798-807. DOI: 10.1037/a0015824. View

16.

Cherlin A . Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s. J Marriage Fam. 2012; 72(3):403-419. PMC: 3293163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x. View

17.

Jackson G, Trail T, Kennedy D, Williamson H, Bradbury T, Karney B . The salience and severity of relationship problems among low-income couples. J Fam Psychol. 2015; 30(1):2-11. PMC: 4742400. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000158. View

18.

Neff L, Karney B . How does context affect intimate relationships? linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(2):134-48. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203255984. View

19.

Baumeister R . Self-regulation, ego depletion, and inhibition. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 65:313-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.012. View