» Articles » PMID: 36968020

Strand Asymmetries Across Genomic Processes

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Mar 27
PMID 36968020
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Across biological systems, a number of genomic processes, including transcription, replication, DNA repair, and transcription factor binding, display intrinsic directionalities. These directionalities are reflected in the asymmetric distribution of nucleotides, motifs, genes, transposon integration sites, and other functional elements across the two complementary strands. Strand asymmetries, including GC skews and mutational biases, have shaped the nucleotide composition of diverse organisms. The investigation of strand asymmetries often serves as a method to understand underlying biological mechanisms, including protein binding preferences, transcription factor interactions, retrotransposition, DNA damage and repair preferences, transcription-replication collisions, and mutagenesis mechanisms. Research into this subject also enables the identification of functional genomic sites, such as replication origins and transcription start sites. Improvements in our ability to detect and quantify DNA strand asymmetries will provide insights into diverse functionalities of the genome, the contribution of different mutational mechanisms in germline and somatic mutagenesis, and our knowledge of genome instability and evolution, which all have significant clinical implications in human disease, including cancer. In this review, we describe key developments that have been made across the field of genomic strand asymmetries, as well as the discovery of associated mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Characterization of the Complete Mitogenome of the Ring-Necked Pheasant (Galliformes: Phasianidae) and Systematic Implications for Phasianinae Phylogenetics.

Mei Q, Deng Y, Zhao D, Jiang D, Liao Y, Yu X Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766836 PMC: 11675856. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121569.


Complete mitochondrial genome of and its phylogenetic status within the family Cobitidae (Cypriniformes).

Zhou M, Wang C, Xu Z, Peng Z, He Y, Wang Y Zookeys. 2024; 1221:51-69.

PMID: 39703235 PMC: 11653074. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1221.129136.


Disruption of recombination machinery alters the mutational landscape in plant organellar genomes.

Waneka G, Broz A, Wold-McGimsey F, Zou Y, Wu Z, Sloan D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895361 PMC: 11185577. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.03.597120.


Monitoring and quantifying replication fork dynamics with high-throughput methods.

Fajri N, Petryk N Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):729.

PMID: 38877080 PMC: 11178896. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06412-1.

References
1.
Takeuchi Y, Horiuchi T, Kobayashi T . Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev. 2003; 17(12):1497-506. PMC: 196080. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1085403. View

2.
Helmrich A, Ballarino M, Tora L . Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol Cell. 2011; 44(6):966-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.013. View

3.
Emami K, Jain A, Smale S . Mechanism of synergy between TATA and initiator: synergistic binding of TFIID following a putative TFIIA-induced isomerization. Genes Dev. 1997; 11(22):3007-19. PMC: 316697. DOI: 10.1101/gad.11.22.3007. View

4.
Kim E, Wespiser A, Caffrey D . The domain structure and distribution of Alu elements in long noncoding RNAs and mRNAs. RNA. 2015; 22(2):254-64. PMC: 4712675. DOI: 10.1261/rna.048280.114. View

5.
Ginno P, Lott P, Christensen H, Korf I, Chedin F . R-loop formation is a distinctive characteristic of unmethylated human CpG island promoters. Mol Cell. 2012; 45(6):814-25. PMC: 3319272. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.017. View