» Articles » PMID: 36958785

Validation of Quality Indicators for Evaluating Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Services in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Mar 23
PMID 36958785
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess measurement properties of 121 face and content validated quality indicators (QIs) for medication safety in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care.

Design: A mixed methods study: a 6-month observational study in primary care (July-December 2020) and in-depth semistructured online interviews with participants (February-March 2021).

Setting: Sixty community pharmacies in Japan.

Participants: Patients aged 75 years and older who were regularly taking six or more prescription medicines for ˃4 weeks were eligible. The observational study included 457 patients. The interviews were undertaken with 26 community pharmacists, including pharmacy managers and owners.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Five measurement properties of QIs (applicability, improvement potential, acceptability, implementation issues and sensitivity to change) were evaluated. A web application was developed for data reporting and data visualisation.

Results: This study showed that 53 QIs met the measurement properties of applicability, improvement potential, acceptability and implementation issues. Of 53 QIs, 17 also had a high sensitivity to change. Interviews identified eight themes (indicator characteristics, web application, policy, patient, time, competence, pharmacy administration and collaboration) in relation to the consequence of implementation of QIs.

Conclusions: A set of 121 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was field tested for their five measurement properties. This QI set can be used to identify patients who may benefit from clinician reviews of their medicines. These QIs may be applied at different levels within the healthcare system: patient, pharmacy, regional and national levels. Further mechanisms to automatically collect and report data should be established to facilitate sustainable quality improvement initiatives.

Citing Articles

Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development.

Fujita K, Halvorsen K, Sato N, Jazbar J, Modamio P, Waltering I Int J Clin Pharm. 2023; 46(1):70-79.

PMID: 37646963 PMC: 10830737. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01631-8.

References
1.
Hommel I, van Gurp P, Tack C, Wollersheim H, Hulscher M . Perioperative diabetes care: development and validation of quality indicators throughout the entire hospital care pathway. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 25(7):525-34. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004112. View

2.
Wu H, Kouladjian Odonnell L, Fujita K, Masnoon N, Hilmer S . Deprescribing in the Older Patient: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Solutions. Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14:3793-3807. PMC: 8317936. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S253177. View

3.
Arcenillas P, Boix-Palop L, Gomez L, Xercavins M, March P, Martinez L . Assessment of Quality Indicators for Appropriate Antibiotic Use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(12). PMC: 6256780. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00875-18. View

4.
Page A, Falster M, Litchfield M, Pearson S, Etherton-Beer C . Polypharmacy among older Australians, 2006-2017: a population-based study. Med J Aust. 2019; 211(2):71-75. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50244. View

5.
Todd A, Copeland A, Husband A, Kasim A, Bambra C . Access all areas? An area-level analysis of accessibility to general practice and community pharmacy services in England by urbanity and social deprivation. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(5):e007328. PMC: 4431167. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007328. View