» Articles » PMID: 25673575

Development and Measurement of Perioperative Patient Safety Indicators

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2015 Feb 13
PMID 25673575
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To improve perioperative patient safety, hospitals are implementing evidence-based perioperative safety guidelines. To facilitate this process, it is important to provide insight into current practice. For this purpose, we aimed to develop patient safety indicators.

Methods: The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop a set of patient safety indicators based on the perioperative guidelines. First, a core group of experts systematically selected recommendations from the guidelines. Then, an expert panel of representative professionals appraised the recommendations against safety criteria, prioritized them and reached consensus about 11 patient safety indicators. Measurability, applicability, improvement potential (based on current practice) and discriminatory capacity of each indicator were pilot tested in eight hospitals.

Results: Seven structure, two process and two outcome indicators were developed covering the entire perioperative care process. Most indicators showed good applicability (N=11), improvement potential (N=6) and discriminatory capacity (N=7). Four indicators were difficult to measure. Improvement opportunities concerned the use of perioperative stops, timely administration of antibiotics, availability of protocols on perioperative anticoagulants and on prospective risk analysis of medical equipment, presence of a surveillance system for postoperative wound infections, and a morbidity and mortality registration.

Conclusions: Using a systematic, stepwise method 11 patient safety indicators were developed for internal assessment, monitoring and improvement of the perioperative care process. There was large variation in guideline adherence between and within hospitals, identifying opportunities for improvement in the quality of perioperative care.

Citing Articles

Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion.

Shah A, Evans H, Palmer A, MacDonald A, Belete M, von Neree L BJA Open. 2025; 13:100372.

PMID: 39968291 PMC: 11833354. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100372.


Feasibility of quality indicators on prehospital advanced airway management in a physician-staffed emergency medical service: survey-based assessment of the provider point of view.

Kottmann A, Pasquier M, Carron P, Maudet L, Rouve J, Suppan L BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e081951.

PMID: 38453207 PMC: 10921492. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081951.


Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study.

Sato N, Fujita K, Okada H, Kushida K, Chen T BMJ Open. 2023; 13(3):e066665.

PMID: 36958785 PMC: 10040050. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066665.


Quality indicators for anesthesia and perioperative medicine.

Wacker J Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023; 36(2):208-215.

PMID: 36689392 PMC: 9973445. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001227.


Selecting Performance Indicators and Targets in Health Care: An International Scoping Review and Standardized Process Framework.

Heenan M, Randall G, Evans J Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022; 15:747-764.

PMID: 35478929 PMC: 9038160. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S357561.