» Articles » PMID: 36946741

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Analyses Evaluating Omadacycline Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Arising from Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Haemophilus Influenzae

Abstract

Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with activity against Gram-positive and -negative organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, is approved in the United States to treat patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Using nonclinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets for efficacy and surveillance data for omadacycline against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, and a population pharmacokinetic model, PK-PD target attainment analyses were undertaken using total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma exposures to evaluate omadacycline 100 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 12 h or 200 mg i.v. every 24 h (q24h) on day 1, followed by 100 mg i.v. q24h on day 2 and 300 mg orally q24h on days 3 to 5 for patients with CABP. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment on days 1 and 2 by MIC were assessed using the following four approaches for selecting PK-PD targets: (i) median, (ii) second highest, (iii) highest, and (iv) randomly assigned total-drug ELF and free-drug plasma ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC ratio) targets associated with a 1-log CFU reduction from baseline. Percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on total-drug ELF AUC/MIC ratio targets on days 1 and 2 were ≥91.1% for S. pneumoniae for all approaches but the highest target and ≥99.2% for H. influenzae for all approaches at MICs (0.12 and 1 μg/mL for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively). Lower percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on free-drug plasma AUC/MIC ratio targets were observed for randomly assigned and the highest free-drug plasma targets for S. pneumoniae and for all targets for H. influenzae. These data provided support for approved omadacycline dosing regimens to treat patients with CABP and decisions for the interpretive criteria for the susceptibility testing of omadacycline against these pathogens.

Citing Articles

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Omadacycline for community-acquired pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, and nontuberculous mycobacteria (focus on ).

File Jr T, Ramirez J, Wilde A Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025; 69(2):e0108724.

PMID: 39817764 PMC: 11823662. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01087-24.


Assessment of pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics to support omadacycline dosing regimens for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Bhavnani S, Hammel J, Lakota E, Liolios K, Trang M, Rubino C Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(9):e0128123.

PMID: 39082883 PMC: 11373226. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01281-23.


Translational PK/PD for the Development of Novel Antibiotics-A Drug Developer's Perspective.

Bissantz C, Zampaloni C, David-Pierson P, Dieppois G, Guenther A, Trauner A Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38247631 PMC: 10812724. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010072.


New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians.

Carcione D, Intra J, Andriani L, Campanile F, Gona F, Carletti S Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(9).

PMID: 37765112 PMC: 10536666. DOI: 10.3390/ph16091304.


Development of Modernized Acinetobacter baumannii Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria for Recommended Antimicrobial Agents Using Pharmacometric Approaches.

Lepak A, Trang M, Hammel J, Sader H, Bhavnani S, VanScoy B Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023; 67(4):e0145222.

PMID: 36946729 PMC: 10112158. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01452-22.


References
1.
Jain S, Self W, Wunderink R, Fakhran S, Balk R, Bramley A . Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization among U.S. Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(5):415-27. PMC: 4728150. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500245. View

2.
Rodvold K, Hope W, Boyd S . Considerations for effect site pharmacokinetics to estimate drug exposure: concentrations of antibiotics in the lung. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2017; 36:114-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2017.09.019. View

3.
Pfaller M, Huband M, Shortridge D, Flamm R . Surveillance of omadacycline activity tested against clinical isolates from the USA: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2019. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021; 27:337-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.09.011. View

4.
Heron M . Deaths: Leading Causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017; 66(5):1-76. View

5.
ORiordan W, Cardenas C, Shin E, Sirbu A, Garrity-Ryan L, Das A . Once-daily oral omadacycline versus twice-daily oral linezolid for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (OASIS-2): a phase 3, double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019; 19(10):1080-1090. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30275-0. View