The Minimal Intrinsic Stochasticity of Constitutively Expressed Eukaryotic Genes is Sub-Poissonian

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2023 Mar 22

PMID 36945401

Authors

Douglas E Weidemann

Abhyudai Singh

Ramon Grima

Silke Hauf

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Stochastic variation in gene products ("noise") is an inescapable by-product of gene expression. Noise must be minimized to allow for the reliable execution of cellular functions. However, noise cannot be suppressed beyond an intrinsic lower limit. For constitutively expressed genes, this limit is believed to be Poissonian, meaning that the variance in mRNA numbers cannot be lower than their mean. Here, we show that several cell division genes in fission yeast have mRNA variances significantly below this limit, which cannot be explained by the classical gene expression model for low-noise genes. Our analysis reveals that multiple steps in both transcription and mRNA degradation are essential to explain this sub-Poissonian variance. The sub-Poissonian regime differs qualitatively from previously characterized noise regimes, a hallmark being that cytoplasmic noise is reduced when the mRNA export rate increases. Our study re-defines the lower limit of eukaryotic gene expression noise and identifies molecular requirements for ultra-low noise which are expected to support essential cell functions.

References

Nieuwkoop T, Finger-Bou M, van der Oost J, Claassens N . The Ongoing Quest to Crack the Genetic Code for Protein Production. Mol Cell. 2020; 80(2):193-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.09.014. View

Makela J, Kandhavelu M, Oliveira S, Chandraseelan J, Lloyd-Price J, Peltonen J . In vivo single-molecule kinetics of activation and subsequent activity of the arabinose promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(13):6544-52. PMC: 3711423. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt350. View

Chung E, Chen R . Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol Biol Cell. 2002; 13(5):1501-11. PMC: 111122. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.02-01-0003. View

Sheff M, Thorn K . Optimized cassettes for fluorescent protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2004; 21(8):661-70. DOI: 10.1002/yea.1130. View

Yamada H, Matsumoto S, Matsumoto T . High dosage expression of a zinc finger protein, Grt1, suppresses a mutant of fission yeast slp1(+), a homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy. J Cell Sci. 2000; 113 ( Pt 22):3989-99. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.113.22.3989. View

Chen X, Zhang J . The Genomic Landscape of Position Effects on Protein Expression Level and Noise in Yeast. Cell Syst. 2016; 2(5):347-54. PMC: 4882239. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.03.009. View

Gandhi S, Zenklusen D, Lionnet T, Singer R . Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010; 18(1):27-34. PMC: 3058351. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1934. View

Carey J, Mettert E, Roggiani M, Myers K, Kiley P, Goulian M . Regulated Stochasticity in a Bacterial Signaling Network Permits Tolerance to a Rapid Environmental Change. Cell. 2018; 173(1):196-207.e14. PMC: 5866230. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.005. View

Chubb J, Trcek T, Shenoy S, Singer R . Transcriptional pulsing of a developmental gene. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(10):1018-25. PMC: 4764056. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.092. View

10.

Bahler J, Wu J, Longtine M, Shah N, McKenzie 3rd A, Steever A . Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1998; 14(10):943-51. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<943::AID-YEA292>3.0.CO;2-Y. View

11.

Iyer-Biswas S, Jayaprakash C . Mixed Poisson distributions in exact solutions of stochastic autoregulation models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014; 90(5-1):052712. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052712. View

12.

Voichek Y, Bar-Ziv R, Barkai N . Expression homeostasis during DNA replication. Science. 2016; 351(6277):1087-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1162. View

13.

Zenklusen D, Larson D, Singer R . Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008; 15(12):1263-71. PMC: 3154325. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1514. View

14.

Hansen M, Desai R, Simpson M, Weinberger L . Cytoplasmic Amplification of Transcriptional Noise Generates Substantial Cell-to-Cell Variability. Cell Syst. 2018; 7(4):384-397.e6. PMC: 6202163. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.08.002. View

15.

Fraser D, Kaern M . A chance at survival: gene expression noise and phenotypic diversification strategies. Mol Microbiol. 2009; 71(6):1333-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06605.x. View

16.

Choubey S, Kondev J, Sanchez A . Deciphering Transcriptional Dynamics In Vivo by Counting Nascent RNA Molecules. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(11):e1004345. PMC: 4636183. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004345. View

17.

Kaern M, Elston T, Blake W, Collins J . Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(6):451-64. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1615. View

18.

Rohner S, Gasser S, Meister P . Modules for cloning-free chromatin tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisae. Yeast. 2008; 25(3):235-9. DOI: 10.1002/yea.1580. View

19.

Hornung G, Bar-Ziv R, Rosin D, Tokuriki N, Tawfik D, Oren M . Noise-mean relationship in mutated promoters. Genome Res. 2012; 22(12):2409-17. PMC: 3514670. DOI: 10.1101/gr.139378.112. View

20.

Zhurinsky J, Leonhard K, Watt S, Marguerat S, Bahler J, Nurse P . A coordinated global control over cellular transcription. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(22):2010-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.002. View