» Articles » PMID: 36944827

Visualization of Fibroblast Activation Using Ga-FAPI PET/CT After Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Pulsed Field Compared with Cryoballoon Ablation

Abstract

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablating myocardium by electroporation without tissue-heating. With its different mechanism of tissue ablation, it is assumed that lesion creation is divergent to thermal energy sources. Ga-fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT targets FAP-alpha expressed by activated fibroblasts. We aimed to assess Ga-FAPI uptake in pulmonary veins as surrogate for ablation damage after PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA).

Methods: 26 patients (15 PFA, 11 CBA) underwent Ga-FAPI-PET/CT after ablation. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and fibroblast-activation volumes of localized tracer uptake were assessed.

Results: Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. In PFA, focal FAPI uptake was only observed in 3/15 (20%) patients, whereas in the CBA cohort, 10/11 (90.9%) patients showed atrial visual uptake. We observed lower values of SUV (2.85 ± 0.56 vs 4.71 ± 2.06, P = 0.025) and FAV (1.13 ± 0.84 cm vs 3.91 ± 2.74 cm, P = 0.014) along with a trend towards lower SUV and SUV in PFA vs CBA patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Tissue response with respect to fibroblast activation seems to be less pronounced in PFA compared to established thermal ablation systems. This functional assessment might contribute to a better understanding of lesion formation in thermal and PFA ablation potentially contributing to better safety outcomes.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Li R, Zhang X, Liu X, Gu Z, He J, Dong Y JACC Asia. 2025; 5(1):143-157.

PMID: 39896250 PMC: 11782097. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.09.014.


Safety and Efficacy of Pulse Field Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Comparison with Traditional Thermal Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gong A, Li W, Li F, Tong Y, Cao Y, Zeng R Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(11):415.

PMID: 39618880 PMC: 11607503. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2511415.


Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.

Meng F, Jin S, Liu N Curr Opin Cardiol. 2024; 40(1):37-41.

PMID: 39611738 PMC: 11623377. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001183.


Efficacy and safety of pulsed-field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amin A, Nazir A, Abuelazm M, Ibrahim A, Elbenawi H, Aboutaleb A J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(5):1059-1074.

PMID: 39416254 PMC: 11474578. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13118.


Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

de Campos M, Moraes V, Daher R, Micheleto J, de Campos L, Barros G Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(6):385-395.

PMID: 38984363 PMC: 11228281. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.04.012.


References
1.
Kessler L, Kupusovic J, Ferdinandus J, Hirmas N, Umutlu L, Zarrad F . Visualization of Fibroblast Activation After Myocardial Infarction Using 68Ga-FAPI PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2021; 46(10):807-813. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003745. View

2.
Maor E, Ivorra A, Rubinsky B . Non thermal irreversible electroporation: novel technology for vascular smooth muscle cells ablation. PLoS One. 2009; 4(3):e4757. PMC: 2650260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004757. View

3.
Halbfass P, Mitlacher M, Turschner O, Brachmann J, Mahnkopf C . Lesion formation after pulmonary vein isolation using the advance cryoballoon and the standard cryoballoon: lessons learned from late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Europace. 2015; 17(4):566-73. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu260. View

4.
Scott Jr L, Li N, Dobrev D . Role of inflammatory signaling in atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 287:195-200. PMC: 6447485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.020. View

5.
Staerk L, Sherer J, Ko D, Benjamin E, Helm R . Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Res. 2017; 120(9):1501-1517. PMC: 5500874. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732. View