» Articles » PMID: 36944080

Error-Correction Method for High-Throughput Sizing of Nanoscale Vesicles with Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy

Overview
Journal J Phys Chem B
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2023 Mar 21
PMID 36944080
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) allows super-resolution imaging, mapping, counting, and sizing of biological nanostructures such as cell organelles and extracellular vesicles (EVs), but sizing structures smaller than ∼100 nm can be inaccurate due to single-molecule localization error caused by distortion of the point spread function and limited photon number. Here we demonstrate a method to correct localization error when sizing vesicles and other spherical nanoparticles with SMLM and compare sizing results using two vesicle labeling schemes. We use mean approximation theory to derive a simple equation using full width at half-maximum (FWHM) for correcting particle sizes measured by two-dimensional SMLM, validate the method by sizing streptavidin-coated polystyrene nanobeads with the SMLM technique STORM with and without error correction, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for comparison, and then apply the method to sizing small seminal EVs. Nanobead sizes measured by STORM became increasingly less accurate (larger than TEM values) for beads smaller than 50 nm. The error-correction method reduced the size difference versus TEM from 15% without error correction to 7% with error correction for 40 nm beads, from 44% to 9% for 30 nm beads, and from 66% to 15% for 20 nm beads. Seminal EVs were labeled with a lipophilic membrane dye (MemBright 700) and with an Alexa Fluor 488-anti-CD63 antibody conjugate, and were sized separately using both dyes by STORM. Error-corrected exosome diameters were smaller than uncorrected values: 72 nm vs 79 nm mean diameter with membrane dyes; 84 nm vs 97 nm with the antibody-conjugated dyes. The mean error-corrected diameter was 12 nm smaller when using the membrane dye than when using the antibody-conjugated dye likely due to the large size of the antibody. Thus, both the error-correction method and the compact membrane labeling scheme reduce overestimation of vesicle size by SMLM. This error-correction method has a low computational cost as it does not require correction of individual blinking events, and it is compatible with all SMLM techniques (e.g., PALM, STORM, and DNA-PAINT).

Citing Articles

Optical Imaging of Single Extracellular Vesicles: Recent Progress and Prospects.

Ma B, Li L, Bao Y, Yuan L, Liu S, Qi L Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024; 2(1):27-46.

PMID: 39473463 PMC: 11504620. DOI: 10.1021/cbmi.3c00095.


Comparison of EV characterization by commercial high-sensitivity flow cytometers and a custom single-molecule flow cytometer.

Kim J, Xu S, Jung S, Nguyen A, Cheng Y, Zhao M J Extracell Vesicles. 2024; 13(8):e12498.

PMID: 39140467 PMC: 11322860. DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12498.


Extracellular Vesicle Preparation and Analysis: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Wang Z, Zhou X, Kong Q, He H, Sun J, Qiu W Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(30):e2401069.

PMID: 38874129 PMC: 11321646. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202401069.


Molecular mapping of neuronal architecture using STORM microscopy and new fluorescent probes for SMLM imaging.

Breton V, Nazac P, Boulet D, Danglot L Neurophotonics. 2024; 11(1):014414.

PMID: 38464866 PMC: 10923464. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.1.014414.

References
1.
Endesfelder U, Malkusch S, Fricke F, Heilemann M . A simple method to estimate the average localization precision of a single-molecule localization microscopy experiment. Histochem Cell Biol. 2014; 141(6):629-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00418-014-1192-3. View

2.
Levet F, Hosy E, Kechkar A, Butler C, Beghin A, Choquet D . SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(11):1065-71. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3579. View

3.
Collot M, Ashokkumar P, Anton H, Boutant E, Faklaris O, Galli T . MemBright: A Family of Fluorescent Membrane Probes for Advanced Cellular Imaging and Neuroscience. Cell Chem Biol. 2019; 26(4):600-614.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.01.009. View

4.
Roy A, Zhang W, Jahed Z, Tsai C, Cui B, Moerner W . Exploring Cell Surface-Nanopillar Interactions with 3D Super-Resolution Microscopy. ACS Nano. 2021; 16(1):192-210. PMC: 8830212. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c05313. View

5.
Mazouchi A, Milstein J . Fast Optimized Cluster Algorithm for Localizations (FOCAL): a spatial cluster analysis for super-resolved microscopy. Bioinformatics. 2015; 32(5):747-54. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv630. View