» Articles » PMID: 36941632

Distinct Reinforcement Learning Profiles Distinguish Between Language and Attentional Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Mar 21
PMID 36941632
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Theoretical models posit abnormalities in cortico-striatal pathways in two of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders (Developmental dyslexia, DD, and Attention deficit hyperactive disorder, ADHD), but it is still unclear what distinct cortico-striatal dysfunction might distinguish language disorders from others that exhibit very different symptomatology. Although impairments in tasks that depend on the cortico-striatal network, including reinforcement learning (RL), have been implicated in both disorders, there has been little attempt to dissociate between different types of RL or to compare learning processes in these two types of disorders. The present study builds upon prior research indicating the existence of two learning manifestations of RL and evaluates whether these processes can be differentiated in language and attention deficit disorders. We used a two-step RL task shown to dissociate model-based from model-free learning in human learners.

Results: Our results show that, relative to neurotypicals, DD individuals showed an impairment in model-free but not in model-based learning, whereas in ADHD the ability to use both model-free and model-based learning strategies was significantly compromised.

Conclusions: Thus, learning impairments in DD may be linked to a selective deficit in the ability to form action-outcome associations based on previous history, whereas in ADHD some learning deficits may be related to an incapacity to pursue rewards based on the tasks' structure. Our results indicate how different patterns of learning deficits may underlie different disorders, and how computation-minded experimental approaches can differentiate between them.

Citing Articles

Integrating reinforcement learning and serious games to support people with rare genetic diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders: outcomes on parents and caregivers.

Stasolla F, Akbar K, Passaro A, Dragone M, Di Gioia M, Zullo A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1372769.

PMID: 38646123 PMC: 11026657. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1372769.


Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future Trends.

Khalid U, Naeem M, Stasolla F, Syed M, Abbas M, Coronato A Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:943-969.

PMID: 38495919 PMC: 10944308. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S453903.


Combined extended reality and reinforcement learning to promote healthcare and reduce social anxiety in fragile X syndrome: a new assessment tool and a rehabilitative strategy.

Stasolla F, Passaro A, Di Gioia M, Curcio E, Zullo A Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1273117.

PMID: 38179497 PMC: 10765535. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1273117.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Findling C, Skvortsova V, Dromnelle R, Palminteri S, Wyart V . Computational noise in reward-guided learning drives behavioral variability in volatile environments. Nat Neurosci. 2019; 22(12):2066-2077. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0518-9. View

3.
Barnes K, Howard Jr J, Howard D, Kenealy L, Vaidya C . Two forms of implicit learning in childhood ADHD. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010; 35(5):494-505. PMC: 2925298. DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2010.494750. View

4.
Foerde K, Shohamy D . Feedback timing modulates brain systems for learning in humans. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(37):13157-67. PMC: 3328791. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2701-11.2011. View

5.
Lum J, Ullman M, Conti-Ramsden G . Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34(10):3460-76. PMC: 3784964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017. View