» Articles » PMID: 36934755

Stackelberg Evolutionary Game Theory: How to Manage Evolving Systems

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 19
PMID 36934755
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stackelberg evolutionary game (SEG) theory combines classical and evolutionary game theory to frame interactions between a rational leader and evolving followers. In some of these interactions, the leader wants to preserve the evolving system (e.g. fisheries management), while in others, they try to drive the system to extinction (e.g. pest control). Often the worst strategy for the leader is to adopt a constant aggressive strategy (e.g. overfishing in fisheries management or maximum tolerable dose in cancer treatment). Taking into account the ecological dynamics typically leads to better outcomes for the leader and corresponds to the Nash equilibria in game-theoretic terms. However, the leader's most profitable strategy is to anticipate and steer the eco-evolutionary dynamics, leading to the Stackelberg equilibrium of the game. We show how our results have the potential to help in fields where humans try to bring an evolutionary system into the desired outcome, such as, among others, fisheries management, pest management and cancer treatment. Finally, we discuss limitations and opportunities for applying SEGs to improve the management of evolving biological systems. This article is part of the theme issue 'Half a century of evolutionary games: a synthesis of theory, application and future directions'.

Citing Articles

Validation of polymorphic Gompertzian model of cancer through in vitro and in vivo data.

Soboleva A, Kaznatcheev A, Cavill R, Schneider K, Stankova K PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0310844.

PMID: 39787141 PMC: 11717199. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310844.


Research on the mechanism of human-machine security collaboration of miners considering automation trust.

Yang J, Yang X, Chai S, Ni L, Wang X, Pan L Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e39456.

PMID: 39687112 PMC: 11648194. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39456.


The effect of tumor composition on the success of adaptive therapy: The case of metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Salvioli M, Vandelaer L, Baena E, Schneider K, Cavill R, Stankova K PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0308173.

PMID: 39325718 PMC: 11426540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308173.


Evolution of reciprocity with limited payoff memory.

Glynatsi N, McAvoy A, Hilbe C Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2025):20232493.

PMID: 38889792 PMC: 11285750. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2493.


A war on many fronts: cross disciplinary approaches for novel cancer treatment strategies.

Del Pino Herrera A, Ferrall-Fairbanks M Front Genet. 2024; 15:1383676.

PMID: 38873108 PMC: 11169904. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1383676.


References
1.
Ujvari B, Gatenby R, Thomas F . The evolutionary ecology of transmissible cancers. Infect Genet Evol. 2016; 39:293-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.005. View

2.
Metz J, Stankova K, Johansson J . The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics for life histories: from fitness-returns to selection gradients and Pontryagin's maximum principle. J Math Biol. 2015; 72(4):1125-1152. PMC: 4751216. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-015-0938-4. View

3.
Rogalski M, Gowler C, Shaw C, Hufbauer R, Duffy M . Human drivers of ecological and evolutionary dynamics in emerging and disappearing infectious disease systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 372(1712). PMC: 5182439. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0043. View

4.
Turajlic S, Sottoriva A, Graham T, Swanton C . Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(7):404-416. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0114-6. View

5.
Yamamichi M, Yoshida T, Sasaki A . Comparing the effects of rapid evolution and phenotypic plasticity on predator-prey dynamics. Am Nat. 2011; 178(3):287-304. DOI: 10.1086/661241. View