» Articles » PMID: 36918993

Contraceptive Dynamics Among Women with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-income Countries: a Scoping Review Protocol

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Mar 15
PMID 36918993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Contraceptive dynamics is the use of contraception, unmet need, discontinuation, and/or switching of contraception. Women with disabilities (WWDs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a common problem: a low prevalence of contraceptive usage and a high unmet need. Even though certain studies have been conducted in high-income countries, research is scarce on the degree of contraceptive method mix, unmet needs, contraception discontinuation, and switching among WWDs in LMICs. As a result, the scoping review's goal is to investigate, map available evidence, and identify knowledge gaps on contraceptive dynamics within LMICs WWDs.

Methods: The scoping review is guided by the six-stage Arksey and O'Malley methodology framework. Published articles will be retrieved from databases such as PubMed (MEDLINE), the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Global Health. Grey literature databases will be searched using electronic search engines such as Google Scholar, Google, OpenGrey, and Worldcat. In addition, a manual search of reference lists from recognized studies will be conducted, as well as a hand search of the literature. Any type of study design (e.g., randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control or nested case-control studies, qualitative, cross-sectional studies) will be included in this scoping review. There will be no restrictions on publication year. Two independent reviewers will screen relevant publications, and data will be charted accordingly. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist and reporting guidelines will be used to report all parts of the protocol and scoping review.

Discussion: When compared to non-disabled women, WWDs had a lower prevalence of contraceptive usage and a higher unmet need in LMICs. Despite these facts, they are the most marginalized people on the planet. This is, therefore, critical to map available evidence and identify knowledge gaps on contraceptive dynamics. As a result, the findings of this scoping review will be significant in terms of the contraceptive dynamic among WWDs in LMICs.

Systematic Review Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF), with registration number; DOI/10.17605/OSF.IO/XCKPT.

Citing Articles

Spatial modelling of the shared impact of sexual health knowledge and modern contraceptive use among women with disabilities in Africa.

Bolarinwa O, Odimegwu C, Mohammed A, Gayawan E Contracept Reprod Med. 2025; 10(1):16.

PMID: 40016822 PMC: 11869406. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-025-00349-4.


Modern contraceptive utilization among street beggar women in the Sidama region of Ethiopia using bayesian model approach.

Marine B, Zewde M Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):163.

PMID: 39558357 PMC: 11575083. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01905-y.


Improving the sexual health of women with disabilities in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of published studies.

Bolarinwa O, Odimegwu C, Tapera T Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):116.

PMID: 39107772 PMC: 11304614. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01859-1.


Barriers and facilitators to perinatal care of women with disabilities in lower- and middle-income countries: a study protocol for scoping review of qualitative studies.

Asim M, Hameed W, Sohail M, Saleem S, Hayward M, Turan J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e079605.

PMID: 38926146 PMC: 11216051. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079605.


Utilization of family planning and associated factors among women with disabilities in ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Demisse T, Silesh M, Taye B, Moltot T, Chekole M, Ayalew M PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0291189.

PMID: 37683008 PMC: 10490906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291189.

References
1.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

2.
Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18(10):2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. View

3.
Piotrowski K, Snell L . Health needs of women with disabilities across the lifespan. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007; 36(1):79-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00120.x. View

4.
Yimer A, Modiba L . Modern contraceptive methods knowledge and practice among blind and deaf women in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional survey. BMC Womens Health. 2019; 19(1):151. PMC: 6884853. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0850-y. View

5.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C . PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 75:40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. View