» Articles » PMID: 36916738

Surface Hopping Modeling of Charge and Energy Transfer in Active Environments

Overview
Specialties Biophysics
Chemistry
Date 2023 Mar 14
PMID 36916738
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An active environment is any atomic or molecular system changing a chromophore's nonadiabatic dynamics compared to the isolated molecule. The action of the environment on the chromophore occurs by changing the potential energy landscape and triggering new energy and charge flows unavailable in the vacuum. Surface hopping is a mixed quantum-classical approach whose extreme flexibility has made it the primary platform for implementing novel methodologies to investigate the nonadiabatic dynamics of a chromophore in active environments. This Perspective paper surveys the latest developments in the field, focusing on charge and energy transfer processes.

Citing Articles

A dual experimental-theoretical perspective on ESPT photoacids and their challenges ahead.

Sulzner N, Jung G, Nuernberger P Chem Sci. 2025; 16(4):1560-1596.

PMID: 39759939 PMC: 11697080. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc07148d.


Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Evidence for Coexistence of Planar and Nonplanar Intramolecular Charge Transfer Structures in Fluorazene.

Kochman M J Phys Chem A. 2024; 128(32):6685-6694.

PMID: 39109856 PMC: 11331525. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c03693.


Perspective on Theoretical and Experimental Advances in Atmospheric Photochemistry.

Curchod B, Orr-Ewing A J Phys Chem A. 2024; 128(32):6613-6635.

PMID: 39021090 PMC: 11331530. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c03481.


Excitonic Configuration Interaction: Going Beyond the Frenkel Exciton Model.

Pitesa T, Polonius S, Gonzalez L, Mai S J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(13):5609-5634.

PMID: 38885637 PMC: 11238547. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00157.


A Vision for the Future of Multiscale Modeling.

Capone M, Romanelli M, Castaldo D, Parolin G, Bello A, Gil G ACS Phys Chem Au. 2024; 4(3):202-225.

PMID: 38800726 PMC: 11117712. DOI: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.3c00080.


References
1.
Granucci G, Persico M . Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping. J Chem Phys. 2007; 126(13):134114. DOI: 10.1063/1.2715585. View

2.
Zhao L, Wildman A, Pavosevic F, Tully J, Hammes-Schiffer S, Li X . Excited State Intramolecular Proton Transfer with Nuclear-Electronic Orbital Ehrenfest Dynamics. J Phys Chem Lett. 2021; 12(14):3497-3502. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00564. View

3.
Shushkov P, Li R, Tully J . Ring polymer molecular dynamics with surface hopping. J Chem Phys. 2012; 137(22):22A549. DOI: 10.1063/1.4766449. View

4.
Morzan U, Alonso de Armino D, Foglia N, Ramirez F, Gonzalez Lebrero M, Scherlis D . Spectroscopy in Complex Environments from QM-MM Simulations. Chem Rev. 2018; 118(7):4071-4113. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00026. View

5.
Hazra A, Soudackov A, Hammes-Schiffer S . Role of solvent dynamics in ultrafast photoinduced proton-coupled electron transfer reactions in solution. J Phys Chem B. 2010; 114(38):12319-32. DOI: 10.1021/jp1051547. View