» Articles » PMID: 36916728

Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients with Triple-negative Breast Cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-355

Abstract

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 in the global, phase 3, randomized controlled trial KEYNOTE-355. We report results for patients enrolled in Japan. Patients were randomized 2:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. No alpha was assigned to this exploratory analysis. Eighty-seven patients were randomized in Japan (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 61; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 26), 66 (76%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 28 (32%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Median time from randomization to data cutoff (June 15, 2021) was 44.7 (range, 37.2-52.9) months in the ITT population. Hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for OS were 0.36 (0.14-0.89), 0.52 (0.30-0.91), and 0.46 (0.28-0.77) in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and ITT populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for PFS were 0.52 (0.20-1.34), 0.61 (0.35-1.06), and 0.64 (0.39-1.05). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 85% of patients in each group (no grade 5 events). Consistent with the global population, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy tended to show improvements in OS and PFS with manageable toxicity versus placebo plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients and supports this combination in this setting.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Based PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Dai Y, Ruan T, Yang W, Liu S, Chen J, Fang Y Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024; 18:11795549241308072.

PMID: 39734512 PMC: 11672372. DOI: 10.1177/11795549241308072.


PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor‑based immunotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic triple‑negative breast cancer: A meta‑analysis.

Chen Y, Shi L, Yin W, Xia H, Lin C Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(1):57.

PMID: 39606565 PMC: 11600704. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14803.


PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety.

Wang Z, You P, Yang Z, Xiao H, Tang X, Pan Y BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1339.

PMID: 39478479 PMC: 11526542. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13105-9.


Targeting Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Breast Cancer.

Nagahashi M, Miyoshi Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542328 PMC: 10970081. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063354.


Breaking Barriers: The Promise and Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Said S, Ibrahim W Biomedicines. 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38397971 PMC: 10886684. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020369.


References
1.
Villacampa G, Tolosa P, Salvador F, Sanchez-Bayona R, Villanueva L, Dienstmann R . Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in first-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022; 104:102352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102352. View

2.
Shimoi T, Nagai S, Yoshinami T, Takahashi M, Arioka H, Ishihara M . The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer, 2018 edition. Breast Cancer. 2020; 27(3):322-331. PMC: 8062371. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01085-0. View

3.
Cortes J, Cescon D, Rugo H, Nowecki Z, Im S, Yusof M . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020; 396(10265):1817-1828. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9. View

4.
Iwase H, Kurebayashi J, Tsuda H, Ohta T, Kurosumi M, Miyamoto K . Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Breast Cancer. 2009; 17(2):118-24. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0113-0. View

5.
Li X, Yang J, Peng L, Sahin A, Huo L, Ward K . Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 161(2):279-287. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4059-6. View