» Articles » PMID: 36909026

Malignant Melanoma in Older Adults: Different Patient or Different Disease?

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 Mar 13
PMID 36909026
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between older and younger patients with melanoma and to evaluate for differences in tumor genetic makeup that might explain differences in clinical behavior between older and younger cohorts. Materials and methods A consecutive sample of patients diagnosed with melanoma at a single institution from 1984 to 2019 was categorized by age into younger, middle, and older cohorts. Tumor characteristics, melanoma-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival were assessed while accounting for differential follow-up and death from other causes using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. Results A total of 4378 patients were included in the study. Older patients presented with a higher incidence of T3 and T4 tumors, and a lower incidence of T1 tumors (p<0.001). The same group of patients had a lower nodal positivity at any given Breslow thickness (p<0.01). Melanoma-specific survival was lower for older patients with T2 tumors (p=0.046). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival among all age groups and tumor thicknesses (p>0.05). For patients with a given genetic profile, the melanoma-specific survival and recurrence-free survival were equivalent across ages. BRAF was the most common driver in the younger group, while NRAS and other mutations increased in prevalence as age rose. Conclusions Older adults have decreased melanoma-specific survival for T2 tumors and lower nodal positivity, suggesting a different pattern of metastatic progression. The mutational drivers of cutaneous melanoma change with age and may play a role in the different metastatic progression as well as the differential melanoma-specific survival across all age cohorts.

Citing Articles

The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Melanoma.

Kakish H, Jung C, Doh S, Mulligan K, Sheng I, Ammori J Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(12):8230-8239.

PMID: 39039381 PMC: 11467064. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15684-0.


Feasibility and Impact of Embedding an Extended DNA and RNA Tissue-Based Sequencing Panel for the Routine Care of Patients with Advanced Melanoma in Spain.

Castrejon N, Martin R, Carrasco A, Castillo P, Garcia A, Albero-Gonzalez R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000050 PMC: 11241382. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25136942.


The role of imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T3b-T4b melanoma with clinically negative disease.

Papageorge M, Maina R, King A, Lee V, Baumann R, Pucar D Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1143354.

PMID: 37223678 PMC: 10200883. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1143354.

References
1.
Fang P, Boehling N, Koay E, Bucheit A, Jakob J, Settle S . Melanoma brain metastases harboring BRAF or NRAS mutations are associated with an increased local failure rate following conventional therapy. J Neurooncol. 2017; 137(1):67-75. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2695-2. View

2.
Jakob J, Bassett Jr R, Ng C, Curry J, Joseph R, Alvarado G . NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer. 2011; 118(16):4014-23. PMC: 3310961. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26724. View

3.
Sheen Y, Liao Y, Liau J, Lin M, Hsieh Y, Jee S . Prevalence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in cutaneous melanoma patients in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015; 115(2):121-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.02.001. View

4.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):806-8. PMC: 2034723. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. View

5.
Conway W, Faries M, Nicholl M, Terando A, Glass E, Sim M . Age-related lymphatic dysfunction in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16(6):1548-52. PMC: 2752947. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0420-x. View