» Articles » PMID: 22180178

NRAS Mutation Status is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Melanoma

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Dec 20
PMID 22180178
Citations 323
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is a need for improved prognostic markers in melanoma. In this study, the authors tested the prognostic significance and clinicopathologic correlations of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Methods: Clinical and pathologic data were collected retrospectively on melanoma patients who were clinically tested for BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exons 1 and 2) mutations at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Analyses were performed to identify significant associations of mutations with tumor and patient characteristics and with survival from the diagnosis of stage IV disease.

Results: The genotypes of the full cohort (n = 677) were 47% BRAF mutation, 20% NRAS mutation, and 32% wild-type for BRAF and NRAS ("WT"). Tumor mutation status was associated (P = .008) with the risk of central nervous system involvement at the diagnosis of stage IV disease, with a higher prevalence observed in BRAF-mutant (24%) and NRAS-mutant (23%) patients than in WT patients (12%). Among patients with nonuveal melanoma who underwent mutation testing within 6 months of stage IV diagnosis (n = 313), patients with NRAS mutations had a median survival of 8.2 months from stage IV diagnosis, which was shorter than the median survival of WT patients (15.1 months; P = .004). Multivariate analysis of this population incorporating age, sex, metastases (M1) category, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and mutation status confirmed that NRAS mutations are associated independently with decreased overall survival (vs WT; P = .005; hazard ratio, 2.05).

Conclusions: Patients with BRAF or NRAS mutations were more likely than WT patients to have central nervous system involvement at the time they were diagnosed with distant metastatic disease. NRAS mutation status was identified as an independent predictor of shorter survival after a diagnosis of stage IV melanoma.

Citing Articles

Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases.

Jacome M, Wu Q, Chen J, Mohamed Z, Mokhtari S, Pina Y Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076927 PMC: 11900073. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052307.


Research hotspots and trends of immunotherapy and melanoma: A bibliometric analysis during 2014-2024.

Jia Z, Zhang Y, Cao L, Wang J, Liang H Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025; 21(1):2464379.

PMID: 40012099 PMC: 11869780. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2464379.


Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma.

Martinez-Vila C, Teixido C, Aya F, Martin R, Gonzalez-Navarro E, Alos L Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859576 PMC: 11766255. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020861.


Clinical Potential of Misshapen/NIKs-Related Kinase (MINK) 1-A Many-Sided Element of Cell Physiology and Pathology.

Kot A, Koszewska D, Ochman B, Swietochowska E Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(12):13811-13845.

PMID: 39727954 PMC: 11727420. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46120826.


Paradigm of biomarkers in metastatic melanoma (Review).

Pekarek L, Sanchez Cedra A, Jaudenes Y, Ospino L, Pedrejon B, Bernier L Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(2):78.

PMID: 39650232 PMC: 11622106. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14824.


References
1.
Hocker T, Tsao H . Ultraviolet radiation and melanoma: a systematic review and analysis of reported sequence variants. Hum Mutat. 2007; 28(6):578-88. DOI: 10.1002/humu.20481. View

2.
Hodi F, ODay S, Mcdermott D, Weber R, Sosman J, Haanen J . Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(8):711-23. PMC: 3549297. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. View

3.
Chapman P, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen J, Ascierto P, Larkin J . Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(26):2507-16. PMC: 3549296. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103782. View

4.
Edlundh-Rose E, Egyhazi S, Omholt K, Mansson-Brahme E, Platz A, Hansson J . NRAS and BRAF mutations in melanoma tumours in relation to clinical characteristics: a study based on mutation screening by pyrosequencing. Melanoma Res. 2006; 16(6):471-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.cmr.0000232300.22032.86. View

5.
Long G, Menzies A, Nagrial A, Haydu L, Hamilton A, Mann G . Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(10):1239-46. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327. View