» Articles » PMID: 36908052

Sex, Racial, and Ethnic Diversity in Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Clin Transl Sci
Date 2023 Mar 13
PMID 36908052
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diverse representation in clinical trials is crucial to understand the efficacy and safety of drugs in minority groups. This review aims to (1) describe research participants' sex, racial, and ethnic diversity in clinical drug trials and (2) describe the sex distribution of researchers conducting the research. We reviewed all clinical drug trials published in the journals "Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics" and "Clinical and Translational Science" in 2000-2001 and 2020-2021 and analyzed the research participants' and researchers' demographics. We compared the race of the research participants with the concurrent race diversity of the reference population in the countries where the research was conducted. We identified 281 articles with 17,639 research participants. Approximately one-third of the research participants were women in both 2000-2001 and 2020-2021. The representation from racial minorities of Black and Asian people increased from 2000-2001 to 2020-2021, but Asian and Native American people are still under-represented in clinical drug trials today. The proportion of female authors increased, but female authors still made up less than 40% of the total number of authors in 2020-2021. In conclusion, men are still over-represented in clinical pharmacology research, and some races are still vastly under-represented. Furthermore, although the proportion of female authors increased with time, they are still under-represented as first and last authors.

Citing Articles

An expert perspective on diversity-oriented standards for assessing sex and gender in clinical research.

Hambruch H, Laskowski N, Juster R, Halbeisen G, Paslakis G Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15:1448487.

PMID: 39944133 PMC: 11814446. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1448487.


Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trials for pediatric obesity.

Coughlin C, Zoltick E, Stanford F, Ong M Obesity (Silver Spring). 2025; 33(3):560-566.

PMID: 39904717 PMC: 11903186. DOI: 10.1002/oby.24228.


In Reply.

Paslakis G Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024; 121(18):614-615.

PMID: 39656618 PMC: 11661483. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0097.


Representation of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Individuals in Clinical Trials.

Taira D, Ranken M, Seto B, Davis J, Hermosura A, Porter C JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2442204.

PMID: 39470635 PMC: 11522938. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42204.


A survey of skin tone assessment in prospective research.

Weir V, Dempsey K, Wawira Gichoya J, Rotemberg V, Wong A NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):191.

PMID: 39014060 PMC: 11252344. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01176-8.


References
1.
Abdel-Rahman S, Wimes M, Curran T . A call to action: Issuing a diversity and inclusion challenge to research organizations. Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 14(6):2095-2098. PMC: 8604251. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13105. View

2.
Swartz T, Palermo A, Masur S, Aberg J . The Science and Value of Diversity: Closing the Gaps in Our Understanding of Inclusion and Diversity. J Infect Dis. 2019; 220(220 Suppl 2):S33-S41. PMC: 6701939. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz174. View

3.
Raine S, Liu A, Mintz J, Wahood W, Huntley K, Haffizulla F . Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes: Social Determination of Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(21). PMC: 7663309. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218115. View

4.
Ridings J . The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past. Methods Mol Biol. 2012; 947:575-86. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_36. View

5.
Knepper T, McLeod H . When will clinical trials finally reflect diversity?. Nature. 2018; 557(7704):157-159. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05049-5. View