An Authentication Survey on Retail Seafood Products Sold on the Bulgarian Market Underlines the Need for Upgrading the Traceability System

Overview

Journal Foods

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2023 Mar 11

PMID 36900583

Authors

Lara Tinacci

Deyan Stratev

Mariyana Strateva

Georgi Zhelyazkov

Ralica Kyuchukova

Andrea Armani

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Economically motivated or accidental species substitutions lead to economic and potential health damage to consumers with a loss of confidence in the fishery supply chain. In the present study, a three-year survey on 199 retail seafood products sold on the Bulgarian market was addressed to assess: (1) product authenticity by molecular identification; (2) trade name compliance to the list of official trade names accepted in the territory; (3) adherence of the list in force to the market supply. DNA barcoding on mitochondrial and nuclear genes was applied for the identification of whitefish (WF), crustaceans (C) and mollusks (cephalopods-MC; gastropods-MG; bivalves-MB) except for sp. products for which the analysis was conducted with a previously validated RFLP PCR protocol. Identification at the species level was obtained for 94.5% of the products. Failures in species allocation were reconducted due to low resolution and reliability or the absence of reference sequences. The study highlighted an overall mislabeling rate of 11%. WF showed the highest mislabeling rate (14%), followed by MB (12.5%), MC (10%) and C (7.9%). This evidence emphasized the use of DNA-based methods as tools for seafood authentication. The presence of non-compliant trade names and the ineffectiveness of the list to describe the market species varieties attested to the need to improve seafood labeling and traceability at the national level.

References

Cawthorn D, Duncan J, Kastern C, Francis J, Hoffman L . Fish species substitution and misnaming in South Africa: An economic, safety and sustainability conundrum revisited. Food Chem. 2015; 185:165-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.113. View

Espineira M, Vieites J . Rapid method for controlling the correct labeling of products containing common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) and main substitute species (Eledone cirrhosa and Dosidicus gigas) by fast real-time PCR. Food Chem. 2012; 135(4):2439-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.056. View

Handy S, Deeds J, Ivanova N, Hebert P, Hanner R, Ormos A . A single-laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J AOAC Int. 2011; 94(1):201-10. View

Helyar S, Lloyd H, de Bruyn M, Leake J, Bennett N, Carvalho G . Fish product mislabelling: failings of traceability in the production chain and implications for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e98691. PMC: 4055496. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098691. View

Fernandes T, Costa J, Oliveira M, Mafra I . DNA barcoding coupled to HRM analysis as a new and simple tool for the authentication of Gadidae fish species. Food Chem. 2017; 230:49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.015. View

Vindigni G, Pulvirenti A, Alaimo S, Monaco C, Spina D, Peri I . Bioinformatics Approach to Mitigate Mislabeling in EU Seafood Market and Protect Consumer Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(14). PMC: 8305968. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147497. View

Kim D, Yoo W, Park H, Yoo H, Kang D, Jin S . DNA barcoding of fish, insects, and shellfish in Korea. Genomics Inform. 2012; 10(3):206-11. PMC: 3492657. DOI: 10.5808/GI.2012.10.3.206. View

Meiklejohn K, Damaso N, Robertson J . Assessment of BOLD and GenBank - Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0217084. PMC: 6584008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217084. View

Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R . DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994; 3(5):294-9. View

10.

Leray M, Knowlton N, Ho S, Nguyen B, Machida R . GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(45):22651-22656. PMC: 6842603. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911714116. View

11.

Kimura M . A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16(2):111-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF01731581. View

12.

Carlini D, Kunkle L, Vecchione M . A molecular systematic evaluation of the squid genus Illex (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the North Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006; 41(2):496-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.011. View

13.

Fernandez S, Rodriguez-Muniz L, Molina J, Muniz-Rodriguez L, Jimenez J, Garcia-Vazquez E . Lab experience with seafood control at the undergraduate level: Cephalopods as a case study. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020; 48(3):236-246. DOI: 10.1002/bmb.21332. View

14.

Lawrence S, Elliott C, Huisman W, Dean M, van Ruth S . The 11 sins of seafood: Assessing a decade of food fraud reports in the global supply chain. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2022; 21(4):3746-3769. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12998. View

15.

Claremont M, Vermeij G, Williams S, Reid D . Global phylogeny and new classification of the Rapaninae (Gastropoda: Muricidae), dominant molluscan predators on tropical rocky seashores. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012; 66(1):91-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.014. View

16.

Tinacci L, Guidi A, Toto A, Guardone L, Giusti A, DAmico P . DNA barcoding for the verification of supplier's compliance in the seafood chain: How the lab can support companies in ensuring traceability. Ital J Food Saf. 2018; 7(2):6894. PMC: 6037000. DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2018.6894. View

17.

Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View

18.

Tsang L, Ma K, Ahyong S, Chan T, Chu K . Phylogeny of Decapoda using two nuclear protein-coding genes: origin and evolution of the Reptantia. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008; 48(1):359-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.009. View

19.

Feldmann F, Ardura A, Blanco-Fernandez C, Garcia-Vazquez E . DNA Analysis Detects Different Mislabeling Trend by Country in European Cod Fillets. Foods. 2021; 10(7). PMC: 8303571. DOI: 10.3390/foods10071515. View

20.

Fernandes T, Amaral J, Mafra I . DNA barcode markers applied to seafood authentication: an updated review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020; 61(22):3904-3935. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1811200. View