» Articles » PMID: 36899982

Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia and Metabolic Parameters of F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer

Abstract

We investigated the prognostic value of sarcopenia measurements and metabolic parameters of primary tumors derived from F-FDG-PET/CT among patients with primary, metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer. A total of 128 patients (26 females; 102 males; mean age 63.5 ± 11.7 years; age range: 29-91 years) with advanced metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent F-FDG-PET/CT as part of their initial staging between November 2008 and December 2019 were included. Mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) were measured. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the level of L3 on the CT component of the F-FDG-PET/CT. Sarcopenia was defined as SMI < 34.4 cm/m in women and <45.4 cm/m in men. A total of 60/128 patients (47%) had sarcopenia on baseline F-FDG-PET/CT. Mean SMI in patients with sarcopenia was 29.7 cm/m in females and 37.5 cm/m in males. In a univariable analysis, ECOG (<0.001), bone metastases ( = 0.028), SMI ( = 0.0075) and dichotomized sarcopenia score ( = 0.033) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Age was a poor prognostic factor for OS ( = 0.017). Standard metabolic parameters were not statistically significant in the univariable analysis and thus were not evaluated further. In a multivariable analysis, ECOG ( < 0.001) and bone metastases ( = 0.019) remained significant poor prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The final model demonstrated improved OS and PFS prognostication when combining clinical parameters with imaging-derived sarcopenia measurements but not metabolic tumor parameters. In summary, the combination of clinical parameters and sarcopenia status, but not standard metabolic values from F-FDG-PET/CT, may improve survival prognostication in patients with advanced, metastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

Citing Articles

Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: Can Radiomic Parameters from Baseline F-FDG-PET/CT Predict the Development of Distant Metastatic Disease?.

Hinzpeter R, Mirshahvalad S, Kulanthaivelu R, Kohan A, Ortega C, Metser U Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893731 PMC: 11171817. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111205.


Correlation between sarcopenia and esophageal cancer: a narrative review.

Li S, Xie K, Xiao X, Xu P, Tang M, Li D World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):27.

PMID: 38267975 PMC: 10809562. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03304-w.

References
1.
Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker S, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger R . Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(5):489-95. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. View

2.
Deng H, Zha P, Peng L, Hou L, Huang K, Li X . Preoperative sarcopenia is a predictor of poor prognosis of esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2018; 32(3). DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy115. View

3.
Makiura D, Ono R, Inoue J, Kashiwa M, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T . Preoperative sarcopenia is a predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer following esophagectomy: A retrospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016; 7(6):430-436. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.07.003. View

4.
Li Y, Zschaeck S, Lin Q, Chen S, Chen L, Wu H . Metabolic parameters of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT predict overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with (chemo-) radiation. Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14(1):35. PMC: 6381652. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1236-x. View

5.
Cruz-Jentoft A, Baeyens J, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F . Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(4):412-23. PMC: 2886201. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. View