» Articles » PMID: 36897217

Significance of the Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Adverse Pathology on Radical Prostatectomy: Application in Active Surveillance

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2023 Mar 10
PMID 36897217
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prognostic significance of the maximum allowable percentage of Gleason pattern 4 (GP4) at prostate biopsy compared with adverse pathology observed at radical prostatectomy (RP) to expand active surveillance eligibility among a cohort with intermediate risk of prostate cancer.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients with grade group (GG) 1 or 2 prostate cancer on prostate biopsy with subsequent RP was performed at our institution. A Fisher exact test was used to understand the relationship among GP4 subgroups (0%, ≤5%, 6%-10%, and 11%-49%) assigned at biopsy and adverse pathologic findings at RP. Additional analyses comparing the GP4 ≤5% cohort's prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and GP4 length with adverse pathology at RP were also performed.

Results: No statistically significant difference in adverse pathology at RP was observed between the active surveillance-eligible control (GP4 0%) and the GP4 ≤5% subgroup. In total, 68.9% of the GP4 ≤5% cohort showed favorable pathologic outcomes. A separate analysis of the GP4 ≤5% subgroup revealed that neither prebiopsy serum PSA levels nor GP4 length showed statistical correlation with adverse pathology at RP.

Conclusions: Active surveillance may be a reasonable option for management of patients in the GP4 ≤5% group until long-term follow-up data become available.

Citing Articles

Organ-confined prostate cancer with negative surgical margins in an entirely-embedded radical prostatectomy is essentially non-lethal-a retrospective single-institutional study of 520 patients.

Luo W, Lammert S, Coukos J, Modi P, Antic T, Kwon J Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 57(4):1105-1112.

PMID: 39576420 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04296-y.


Systematic Biopsy vs. Prostatectomy: Evaluating Correlations and Grading Discrepancies in Prostate Cancer.

Loghin A, Popelea M, Nechifor-Boila I, Borda A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e68075.

PMID: 39347309 PMC: 11437350. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68075.


Using active surveillance for Gleason 7 (3+4) prostate cancer: A narrative review.

Bernardino R, Sayyid R, Leao R, Zlotta A, van der Kwast T, Klotz L Can Urol Assoc J. 2024; 18(4):135-144.

PMID: 38381936 PMC: 11034964. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8539.


Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Kamecki H, Mielczarek L, Szemplinski S, Debowska M, Rajwa P, Baboudjian M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).

PMID: 38001723 PMC: 10670701. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225462.