» Articles » PMID: 36888930

Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Final Results of a Phase Ib Study

Abstract

Purpose: Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks cluster of differentiation 47, a don't-eat-me signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Cluster of differentiation 47 blockade by magrolimab promotes macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine, which increases expression of eat-me signals. We report final phase Ib data in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with magrolimab and azacitidine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479).

Patients And Methods: Patients with previously untreated Revised International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS received magrolimab intravenously as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg once-weekly or once-every-2-week maintenance dose. Azacitidine 75 mg/m was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate.

Results: Ninety-five patients were treated. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk was intermediate/high/very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Fifty-nine (62%) had poor-risk cytogenetics and 25 (26%) had mutation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), and anemia (52%). Median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.7 g/dL (range, -3.1 to +2.4). CR rate and overall response rate were 33% and 75%, respectively. Median time to response, duration of CR, duration of overall response, and progression-free survival were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with 17.1-month follow-up. In -mutant patients, 40% achieved CR with median OS of 16.3 months. Thirty-four patients (36%) had allogeneic stem-cell transplant with 77% 2-year OS.

Conclusion: Magrolimab + azacitidine was well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with untreated higher-risk MDS, including those with mutations. A phase III trial of magrolimab/placebo + azacitidine is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881 [ENHANCE]).

Citing Articles

The Emerging Role of CD8 T Cells in Shaping Treatment Outcomes of Patients with MDS and AML.

Tasis A, Spyropoulos T, Mitroulis I Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075597 PMC: 11898900. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050749.


Precision Medicine in Myeloid Neoplasia: Challenges and Opportunities.

Hochman M, Muniz J, Papadantonakis N J Pers Med. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39997326 PMC: 11856194. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15020049.


Decitabine with etoposide is effective in TP53 mutated myeloid tumors via overcoming differentiation block.

Ma J, Sun S, Xie Y, Zhou S, Wu M, Zuo X Blood Cancer J. 2025; 15(1):19.

PMID: 39948069 PMC: 11825841. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-025-01228-6.


First-in-human phase I trial of the bispecific CD47 inhibitor and CD40 agonist Fc-fusion protein, SL-172154 in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Lakhani N, Stewart D, Richardson D, Dockery L, Van Le L, Call J J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39800375 PMC: 11749819. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010565.


Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors Enhance Phagocytosis Induced by CD47 Blockade in Sensitive and Resistant ALK-Driven Malignancies.

Malighetti F, Villa M, Mauri M, Piane S, Crippa V, Crespiatico I Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767726 PMC: 11673128. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122819.


References
1.
Fenaux P, Mufti G, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A . Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(3):223-32. PMC: 4086808. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8. View

2.
Gerds A, Gooley T, Estey E, Appelbaum F, Deeg H, Scott B . Pretransplantation therapy with azacitidine vs induction chemotherapy and posttransplantation outcome in patients with MDS. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18(8):1211-8. PMC: 3376402. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.009. View

3.
Chao M, Takimoto C, Feng D, McKenna K, Gip P, Liu J . Therapeutic Targeting of the Macrophage Immune Checkpoint CD47 in Myeloid Malignancies. Front Oncol. 2020; 9:1380. PMC: 6990910. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01380. View

4.
Silverman L, McKenzie D, Peterson B, Holland J, Backstrom J, Beach C . Further analysis of trials with azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: studies 8421, 8921, and 9221 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(24):3895-903. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.4346. View

5.
Ades L, Girshova L, Doronin V, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Kambhampati S . Pevonedistat plus azacitidine vs azacitidine alone in higher-risk MDS/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast-percentage AML. Blood Adv. 2022; 6(17):5132-5145. PMC: 9631625. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007334. View