» Articles » PMID: 34972214

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Azacitidine with or Without Durvalumab As First-line Therapy for Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Abstract

Azacitidine-mediated hypomethylation promotes tumor cell immune recognition but may increase the expression of inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules. We conducted the first randomized phase 2 study of azacitidine plus the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab vs azacitidine monotherapy as first-line treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS). In all, 84 patients received 75 mg/m2 subcutaneous azacitidine (days 1-7 every 4 weeks) combined with 1500 mg intravenous durvalumab on day 1 every 4 weeks (Arm A) for at least 6 cycles or 75 mg/m² subcutaneous azacitidine alone (days 1-7 every 4 weeks) for at least 6 cycles (Arm B). After a median follow-up of 15.25 months, 8 patients in Arm A and 6 in Arm B remained on treatment. Patients in Arm A received a median of 7.9 treatment cycles and those in Arm B received a median of 7.0 treatment cycles with 73.7% and 65.9%, respectively, completing ≥4 cycles. The overall response rate (primary end point) was 61.9% in Arm A (26 of 42) and 47.6% in Arm B (20 of 42; P = .18), and median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5 months to not evaluable) vs 16.7 months (95% confidence interval, 9.8-23.5 months; P = .74). Durvalumab-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 71.1% of patients; azacitidine-related AEs were reported by 82% (Arm A) and 81% (Arm B). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs were reported in 89.5% (Arm A) vs 68.3% (Arm B) of patients. Patients with TP53 mutations tended to have a worse response than patients without these mutations. Azacitidine increased programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1 [CD274]) surface expression on bone marrow granulocytes and monocytes, but not blasts, in both arms. In summary, combining azacitidine with durvalumab in patients with HR-MDS was feasible but with more toxicities and without significant improvement in clinical outcomes over azacitidine alone. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02775903.

Citing Articles

The Emerging Role of CD8 T Cells in Shaping Treatment Outcomes of Patients with MDS and AML.

Tasis A, Spyropoulos T, Mitroulis I Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075597 PMC: 11898900. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050749.


Sintilimab plus decitabine for higher-risk treatment-naïve myelodysplastic syndromes: efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of a phase II, single-arm trial.

Wang J, Li S, Jiang H, Chang Y, Zhao X, Jia J J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39577869 PMC: 11590843. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010355.


The immunobiology of myelodysplastic neoplasms: a mini-review.

Kannan S, Vedia R, Molldrem J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1419807.

PMID: 39355256 PMC: 11443505. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1419807.


Breaking Boundaries: Immunotherapy for Myeloid Malignancies.

Gavrilova T, Schulz E, Mina A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39199554 PMC: 11352449. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162780.


Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Czech M, Schulz E, Mina A, Gea-Banacloche J Semin Hematol. 2024; 61(6):348-357.

PMID: 39198132 PMC: 11646186. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.07.004.


References
1.
Fenaux P, Mufti G, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Finelli C, Giagounidis A . Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(3):223-32. PMC: 4086808. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8. View

2.
Shields J, Kourtis I, Tomei A, Roberts J, Swartz M . Induction of lymphoidlike stroma and immune escape by tumors that express the chemokine CCL21. Science. 2010; 328(5979):749-52. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185837. View

3.
Zeidan A, Stahl M, Sekeres M, Steensma D, Komrokji R, Gore S . A call for action: Increasing enrollment of untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in first-line clinical trials. Cancer. 2017; 123(19):3662-3672. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30903. View

4.
Ogasawara K, Newhall K, Maxwell S, DellAringa J, Komashko V, Kilavuz N . Population Pharmacokinetics of an Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, Durvalumab in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019; 59(2):217-227. PMC: 7007418. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00804-x. View

5.
Bewersdorf J, Shallis R, Zeidan A . Immune checkpoint inhibition in myeloid malignancies: Moving beyond the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways. Blood Rev. 2020; 45:100709. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100709. View