» Articles » PMID: 36880804

Perspectives of the Cohort of Health Professionals in the WiSDOM Study on the Learning Environment, Transformation, and Social Accountability at a South African University

Overview
Journal Med Educ Online
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2023 Mar 7
PMID 36880804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The dearth of empirical research on transformative health professions education informed this study to examine the factors that influence the perspectives of the cohort of health professionals in the WiSDOM study on the learning environment, transformation, and social accountability at a South African university.

Methods: WiSDOM, a prospective longitudinal cohort study, consists of eight health professional groups: clinical associates, dentists, doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, oral hygienists, pharmacists, and physiotherapists. At study inception in 2017, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire that included four domains of selection criteria (6 items); the learning environment (5 items); redress and transformation (8 items); and social accountability (5 items). In the analysis, we, rescaled the original Likert scoring of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) to a new scale ranging from 0-10. We calculated the mean scores for each item and across items for the four domains, with low scores (0.00-1.99) classified as poor and high scores (8.00-10.00) as excellent. We used multiple linear regression analysis to compare the mean scores, while adjusting for different socio-demographiccharacteristics.

Results: The mean age of the 501 eligible participants was 24.1 years; the majority female (72.9%), 45.3% self-identified as Black African; and 12.2% were born in a rural area. The domains of selection criteria and redress and transformation obtained mean scores of 5.4 and 5.3 out of 10 respectively, while social accountability and the learning environment obtained mean scores of 6.1 and 7.4 out of 10 respectively. Self-identified race influenced the overall mean scores of selection criteria, redress and transformation, and social accountability ( < 0.001). Rural birth influenced the perceptions on selection criteria, redress and transformation ( < 0.01).

Conclusion: The results suggest the need to create inclusive learning environments that foreground redress, transformation, and social accountability, while advancing the discourse on decolonised health sciences education.

Citing Articles

Vaccination status, personal and workplace experiences of early career health professionals in the WiSDOM cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa.

Rispel L, Ditlopo P, White J, Blaauw D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e089998.

PMID: 39645247 PMC: 11628963. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089998.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T . Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010; 376(9756):1923-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. View

3.
Al-Naggar R, Abdulghani M, Osman M, Al-Kubaisy W, Daher A, Nor Aripin K . The Malaysia DREEM: perceptions of medical students about the learning environment in a medical school in Malaysia. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014; 5:177-84. PMC: 4061139. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S61805. View

4.
Colbert-Getz J, Kim S, Goode V, Shochet R, Wright S . Assessing medical students' and residents' perceptions of the learning environment: exploring validity evidence for the interpretation of scores from existing tools. Acad Med. 2014; 89(12):1687-93. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000433. View

5.
Barber C, van der Vleuten C, Leppink J, Chahine S . Social Accountability Frameworks and Their Implications for Medical Education and Program Evaluation: A Narrative Review. Acad Med. 2020; 95(12):1945-1954. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003731. View