The Transformations of Cellulose After Concentrated Sulfuric Acid Treatment and Its Impact on the Enzymatic Saccharification

Overview

Journal Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2023 Mar 3

PMID 36869393

Authors

Shengbo Wu

Suan Shi

Ruotong Liu

Chun Wang

Jing Li

Lujia Han

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The dense structure of cellulose lowers its reactivity and hinders its applications. Concentrated sulfuric acid is an ideal solvent to dissolve cellulose and thus has been used widely to treat cellulose. However, the changes of cellulose after reaction with concentrated sulfuric acid at near-limit S/L ratio and its effect on enzymatic saccharification still need further investigation.

Results: In this study, the interactions between cellulose (Avicel) and 72% sulfuric acid at very low acid loading conditions of 1:2 to 1:3 (S/L ratio) were studied for the enhanced production of glucose. The Avicel gradually transformed from cellulose I structure to cellulose II structure during the sulfuric acid treatment. Other physicochemical characteristics of Avicel also changed dramatically, such as the degree of polymerization, particle size, crystallinity index, and surface morphology. After acid treatment, both the yield and productivity of glucose from cellulose increased significantly under a very low enzyme loading of 5 FPU/g-cellulose. The glucose yields for raw cellulose and acid-treated (30 min) were 57% and 85%, respectively.

Conclusion: Low loadings of concentrated sulfuric acid were proven to be effective to break the recalcitrance of cellulose for enzymatic saccharification. A positive correlation between cellulose CrI and glucose yield was found for concentrated sulfuric acid-treated cellulose, which was opposite to previous reports. Cellulose II content was found to be an important factor that affects the conversion of cellulose to glucose.

Citing Articles

A Study on the Preparation and Performance of Ultrafine Powder Made of Industrial Hemp Degumming Residue.

Shamim S, Huan Y, Gan L, Zhang S Polymers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39771325 PMC: 11728793. DOI: 10.3390/polym16243473.

Intensifying urban imprint on land surface warming: Insights from local to global scale.

Shen P, Zhao S iScience. 2024; 27(3):109110.

PMID: 38433922 PMC: 10904926. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109110.

References

Zhang J, Zhang J, Lin L, Chen T, Zhang J, Liu S . Dissolution of microcrystalline cellulose in phosphoric acid--molecular changes and kinetics. Molecules. 2009; 14(12):5027-41. PMC: 6254803. DOI: 10.3390/molecules14125027. View

Yang J, Gao C, Yang X, Su Y, Shi S, Han L . Effect of combined wet alkaline mechanical pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover and its mechanism. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022; 15(1):31. PMC: 8932242. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02130-0. View

Ji G, Han L, Gao C, Xiao W, Zhang Y, Cao Y . Quantitative approaches for illustrating correlations among the mechanical fragmentation scales, crystallinity and enzymatic hydrolysis glucose yield of rice straw. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 241:262-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.062. View

Srivastava R, Shetti N, Reddy K, Kwon E, Nadagouda M, Aminabhavi T . Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials. Environ Pollut. 2021; 276:116731. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116731. View

Sluiter J, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter A, Templeton D . Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58(16):9043-53. PMC: 2923870. DOI: 10.1021/jf1008023. View

Carere C, Sparling R, Cicek N, Levin D . Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 9(7):1342-1360. PMC: 2635718. DOI: 10.3390/ijms9071342. View

Yue Y, Han J, Han G, Zhang Q, French A, Wu Q . Characterization of cellulose I/II hybrid fibers isolated from energycane bagasse during the delignification process: Morphology, crystallinity and percentage estimation. Carbohydr Polym. 2015; 133:438-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.058. View

Alemdar A, Sain M . Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues: wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 99(6):1664-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029. View

Sun X, Xu F, Sun R, Fowler P, Baird M . Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohydr Res. 2004; 340(1):97-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.10.022. View

10.

Liu Z, Sun X, Hao M, Huang C, Xue Z, Mu T . Preparation and characterization of regenerated cellulose from ionic liquid using different methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2014; 117:99-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.053. View

11.

Zhang Y, Lynd L . Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules. 2005; 6(3):1510-5. DOI: 10.1021/bm049235j. View

12.

Nam S, French A, Condon B, Concha M . Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym. 2015; 135:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035. View

13.

Wiman M, Dienes D, Hansen M, van der Meulen T, Zacchi G, Liden G . Cellulose accessibility determines the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 126:208-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.082. View

14.

Yadav N, Nain L, Khare S . One-pot production of lactic acid from rice straw pretreated with ionic liquid. Bioresour Technol. 2020; 323:124563. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124563. View

15.

Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H, Bohn A . Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005; 44(22):3358-93. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200460587. View

16.

Mattonai M, Pawcenis D, Del Seppia S, Lojewska J, Ribechini E . Effect of ball-milling on crystallinity index, degree of polymerization and thermal stability of cellulose. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 270:270-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.029. View

17.

Peng H, Li H, Luo H, Xu J . A novel combined pretreatment of ball milling and microwave irradiation for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 130:81-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.167. View

18.

Jiang W, Chang S, Qu Y, Zhang Z, Xu J . Changes on structural properties of biomass pretreated by combined deacetylation with liquid hot water and its effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 220:448-456. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.087. View

19.

Moxley G, Zhu Z, Zhang Y . Efficient sugar release by the cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation technology and enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2008; 56(17):7885-90. DOI: 10.1021/jf801303f. View

20.

Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y, Liu F, Wu Q . Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromolecules. 2013; 14(5):1529-40. DOI: 10.1021/bm4001734. View