Critiques Strengthen and Improve the Original Findings: Rejoinder to Commentaries on Sullins (2022b)
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Sullins vs Strizzi and Di Nucci: A Brief Rejoinder to Sullins (2023b).
Strizzi J, Di Nucci E Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 53(2):455-456.
PMID: 37934322 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02731-2.
Sullins D Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 52(7):2727-2730.
PMID: 37670203 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02684-6.
Strizzi J, Di Nucci E Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 52(7):2723-2725.
PMID: 37253922 PMC: 10684620. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02620-8.
References
1.
Austin P, Jembere N, Chiu M
. Propensity score matching and complex surveys. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 27(4):1240-1257.
PMC: 5843030.
DOI: 10.1177/0962280216658920.
View
2.
Biondi-Zoccai G, Romagnoli E, Agostoni P, Capodanno D, Castagno D, DAscenzo F
. Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011; 32(5):731-40.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.006.
View
3.
Blosnich J, Coulter R, Henderson E, Goldbach J, Meyer I
. Correcting a False Research Narrative: A Commentary on Sullins (2022). Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 52(3):885-888.
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02521-2.
View
4.
Dehlin J, Galliher R, Bradshaw W, Hyde D, Crowell K
. Sexual orientation change efforts among current or former LDS church members. J Couns Psychol. 2014; 62(2):95-105.
DOI: 10.1037/cou0000011.
View
5.
Diamond L, Rosky C
. Scrutinizing Immutability: Research on Sexual Orientation and U.S. Legal Advocacy for Sexual Minorities. J Sex Res. 2016; 53(4-5):363-91.
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1139665.
View