Unaddressed Sources of Bias Lead to Biased Conclusions About Sexual Orientation Change Efforts and Suicidality in Sexual Minority Individuals
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Sullins D Arch Sex Behav. 2023; 52(3):889-899.
PMID: 36864320 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-023-02566-x.
References
1.
Biondi-Zoccai G, Romagnoli E, Agostoni P, Capodanno D, Castagno D, DAscenzo F
. Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011; 32(5):731-40.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.006.
View
2.
Bours M
. Tutorial: A nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of effect modification and interaction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 134:113-124.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.022.
View
3.
Cole S, Platt R, Schisterman E, Chu H, Westreich D, Richardson D
. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 39(2):417-20.
PMC: 2846442.
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp334.
View
4.
Dreyer N, Tunis S, Berger M, Ollendorf D, Mattox P, Gliklich R
. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(10):1818-25.
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.
View
5.
Elze M, Gregson J, Baber U, Williamson E, Sartori S, Mehran R
. Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(3):345-357.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.060.
View