» Articles » PMID: 36859459

Top-down Effect of Dialogue Coherence on Perceived Speaker Identity

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Mar 1
PMID 36859459
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A key mechanism in the comprehension of conversation is the ability for listeners to recognize who is speaking and when a speaker switch occurs. Some authors suggest that speaker change detection is accomplished through bottom-up mechanisms in which listeners draw on changes in the acoustic features of the auditory signal. Other accounts propose that speaker change detection involves drawing on top-down linguistic representations to identify who is speaking. The present study investigates these hypotheses experimentally by manipulating the pragmatic coherence of conversational utterances. In experiment 1, participants listened to pairs of utterances and had to indicate whether they heard the same or different speakers. Even though all utterances were spoken by the same speaker, our results show that when two segments of conversation are spoken by the same speaker but make sense for different speakers to say, listeners report hearing different speakers. In experiment 2 we removed pragmatic information from the same stimuli by scrambling word order while leaving acoustic information intact. In contrast to experiment 1, results from the second experiment indicate no difference between our experimental conditions. We interpret these results as a top-down effect of pragmatic expectations: knowledge of conversational structure at least partially determines a listener's perception of speaker changes in conversation.

Citing Articles

Talker change detection by listeners varying in age and hearing loss.

Best V, Ahlstrom J, Mason C, Perrachione T, Kidd Jr G, Dubno J J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(4):2482-2491.

PMID: 38587430 PMC: 11003761. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025539.

References
1.
Darwin C, Brungart D, Simpson B . Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 114(5):2913-22. DOI: 10.1121/1.1616924. View

2.
Baumann O, Belin P . Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers. Psychol Res. 2008; 74(1):110-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0185-z. View

3.
Ganong 3rd W . Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980; 6(1):110-25. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.110. View

4.
van Berkum J, van den Brink D, Tesink C, Kos M, Hagoort P . The neural integration of speaker and message. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 20(4):580-91. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20054. View

5.
Neuhoff J, Bochtler K . Change deafness, dual-task performance, and domain-specific expertise. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017; 71(5):1100-1111. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310266. View