» Articles » PMID: 25786962

Rhythmic Variability Between Speakers: Articulatory, Prosodic, and Linguistic Factors

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2015 Mar 20
PMID 25786962
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Between-speaker variability of acoustically measurable speech rhythm [%V, ΔV(ln), ΔC(ln), and Δpeak(ln)] was investigated when within-speaker variability of (a) articulation rate and (b) linguistic structural characteristics was introduced. To study (a), 12 speakers of Standard German read seven lexically identical sentences under five different intended tempo conditions (very slow, slow, normal, fast, very fast). To study (b), 16 speakers of Zurich Swiss German produced 16 spontaneous utterances each (256 in total) for which transcripts were made and then read by all speakers (4096 sentences; 16 speaker × 256 sentences). Between-speaker variability was tested using analysis of variance with repeated measures on within-speaker factors. Results revealed strong and consistent between-speaker variability while within-speaker variability as a function of articulation rate and linguistic characteristics was typically not significant. It was concluded that between-speaker variability of acoustically measurable speech rhythm is strong and robust against various sources of within-speaker variability. Idiosyncratic articulatory movements were found to be the most plausible factor explaining between-speaker differences.

Citing Articles

Voice Patterns as Markers of Schizophrenia: Building a Cumulative Generalizable Approach Via a Cross-Linguistic and Meta-analysis Based Investigation.

Parola A, Simonsen A, Lin J, Zhou Y, Wang H, Ubukata S Schizophr Bull. 2023; 49(Suppl_2):S125-S141.

PMID: 36946527 PMC: 10031745. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac128.


Top-down effect of dialogue coherence on perceived speaker identity.

Warnke L, de Ruiter J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3458.

PMID: 36859459 PMC: 9977839. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30435-z.


Functional timing or rhythmical timing, or both? A corpus study of English and Mandarin duration.

Wang C, Xu Y, Zhang J Front Psychol. 2023; 13:869049.

PMID: 36743611 PMC: 9895962. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869049.


It's alignment all the way down, but not all the way up: Speakers align on some features but not others within a dialogue.

Ostrand R, Chodroff E J Phon. 2021; 88.

PMID: 34366499 PMC: 8345023. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101074.


Visual mechanisms for voice-identity recognition flexibly adjust to auditory noise level.

Maguinness C, von Kriegstein K Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(12):3963-3982.

PMID: 34043249 PMC: 8288083. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25532.