» Articles » PMID: 36853608

Gender, Racial, and Ethnic and Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Feb 28
PMID 36853608
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Diversity in the biomedical research workforce is essential for addressing complex health problems. Female investigators and investigators from underrepresented ethnic and racial groups generate novel, impactful, and innovative research, yet they are significantly underrepresented among National Institutes of Health (NIH) investigators.

Objective: To examine the gender, ethnic, and racial distribution of super NIH investigators who received 3 or more concurrent NIH grants.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study included a national cohort of NIH-funded principal investigators (PIs) from the NIH Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination (IMPAC II) database from 1991 to 2020.

Exposures: Self-identified gender, race and ethnicity, annual number of NIH grant receipt, career stage, and highest degree.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Distribution of investigators receiving 3 or more research project grants, referred to as super principal investigators (SPIs), by gender, race, and ethnicity.

Results: Among 33 896 investigators in fiscal year 2020, 7478 (22.01%) identified as Asian, 623 (1.8%) as Black, 1624 (4.8%) as Hispanic, and 22 107 (65.2%) as White; 21 936 (61.7%) identified as men; and 8695 (35.3%) were early-stage investigators. Between 1991 and 2020, the proportion of SPIs increased 3-fold from 704 (3.7%) to 3942 (11.3%). However, SPI status was unequal across gender, ethnic, and racial groups. Women and Black PIs were significantly underrepresented among SPIs, even after adjusting for career stage and degree, and were 34% and 40% less likely than their male and White colleagues, respectively, to be an SPI. Black women PIs were the least likely to be represented among SPIs and were 71% less likely to attain SPI status than White men PIs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.21-0.41).

Conclusions And Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of a national cohort of NIH-funded investigators, the gender, ethnic, and racial gaps in receipt of multiple research project grants among NIH investigators was clearly apparent and warrants further investigation and interventions.

Citing Articles

Black women in HIV research: Intersectionality, positionality and our commitment to build a just research enterprise.

Campbell D, Stockman J Womens Health (Lond). 2024; 20:17455057241305071.

PMID: 39707883 PMC: 11663266. DOI: 10.1177/17455057241305071.


Beyond borders: the impact of international fellowships on professional and personal development.

von During S, Ratano D, Cuthbertson B Intensive Care Med. 2024; 50(12):2146-2149.

PMID: 39441356 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07684-1.


The roles of psychosocial resources in reducing the impact of gendered racism on worry among Black women attending an HBCU.

Williams T, Erving C, Mitchell T, Crayton L, Chaney K, Stewart Iv W J Am Coll Health. 2024; 73(3):948-960.

PMID: 39356966 PMC: 11903206. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2024.2382444.


Race and Sex Disparities Among Emergency Medicine Chief Residents.

Tsai J, Nguyen M, Dudgeon S, McDade W, Kim J, Agrawal P JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(9):e2432679.

PMID: 39316403 PMC: 11423172. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32679.


Psychology needs more diversity at the level of Editor-in-Chief.

Haeffel G, Lin Z, Adetula A, Vargas I, Doom J, Moriguchi Y Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):12.

PMID: 39242799 PMC: 11332137. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00058-9.


References
1.
Lorsch J . Maximizing the return on taxpayers' investments in fundamental biomedical research. Mol Biol Cell. 2015; 26(9):1578-82. PMC: 4436771. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1163. View

2.
Freeman R, Huang W . Collaboration: Strength in diversity. Nature. 2014; 513(7518):305. DOI: 10.1038/513305a. View

3.
Hechtman L, Moore N, Schulkey C, Miklos A, Calcagno A, Aragon R . NIH funding longevity by gender. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(31):7943-7948. PMC: 6077749. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800615115. View

4.
Ley T, Hamilton B . Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science. 2008; 322(5907):1472-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1165878. View

5.
Hill K, Desai M, Chaudhry S, Fancher T, Nguyen M, Wang K . National Institutes of Health Diversity Supplement Awards by Medical School. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 38(5):1175-1179. PMC: 10110783. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07849-y. View