» Articles » PMID: 36848395

Interpreting T-cell Search "strategies" in the Light of Evolution Under Constraints

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36848395
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two decades of in vivo imaging have revealed how diverse T-cell motion patterns can be. Such recordings have sparked the notion of search "strategies": T cells may have evolved ways to search for antigen efficiently depending on the task at hand. Mathematical models have indeed confirmed that several observed T-cell migration patterns resemble a theoretical optimum; for example, frequent turning, stop-and-go motion, or alternating short and long motile runs have all been interpreted as deliberately tuned behaviours, optimising the cell's chance of finding antigen. But the same behaviours could also arise simply because T cells cannot follow a straight, regular path through the tight spaces they navigate. Even if T cells do follow a theoretically optimal pattern, the question remains: which parts of that pattern have truly been evolved for search, and which merely reflect constraints from the cell's migration machinery and surroundings? We here employ an approach from the field of evolutionary biology to examine how cells might evolve search strategies under realistic constraints. Using a cellular Potts model (CPM), where motion arises from intracellular dynamics interacting with cell shape and a constraining environment, we simulate evolutionary optimization of a simple task: explore as much area as possible. We find that our simulated cells indeed evolve their motility patterns. But the evolved behaviors are not shaped solely by what is functionally optimal; importantly, they also reflect mechanistic constraints. Cells in our model evolve several motility characteristics previously attributed to search optimisation-even though these features are not beneficial for the task given here. Our results stress that search patterns may evolve for other reasons than being "optimal". In part, they may be the inevitable side effects of interactions between cell shape, intracellular dynamics, and the diverse environments T cells face in vivo.

Citing Articles

Diffusion-limited cytokine signaling in T cell populations.

Brunner P, Kiwitz L, Li L, Thurley K iScience. 2024; 27(6):110134.

PMID: 39678490 PMC: 11639737. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110134.

References
1.
Miller M, Wei S, Cahalan M, Parker I . Autonomous T cell trafficking examined in vivo with intravital two-photon microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(5):2604-9. PMC: 151387. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2628040100. View

2.
Nichol D, Robertson-Tessi M, Anderson A, Jeavons P . Model genotype-phenotype mappings and the algorithmic structure of evolution. J R Soc Interface. 2019; 16(160):20190332. PMC: 6893500. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0332. View

3.
Textor J, Mandl J, De Boer R . The Reticular Cell Network: A Robust Backbone for Immune Responses. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14(10):e2000827. PMC: 5058469. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000827. View

4.
Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen G, Barnhart E, Marriott G, Mogilner A . Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature. 2008; 453(7194):475-80. PMC: 2877812. DOI: 10.1038/nature06952. View

5.
Wu P, Giri A, Sun S, Wirtz D . Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(11):3949-54. PMC: 3964056. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318967111. View