» Articles » PMID: 36846435

A Study on the IOS Application "uHear" As a Screening Tool for Hearing Loss in Bangkok

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36846435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare the results of hearing tests performed using the uHear application with those of standard audiometry in Thai people in Bangkok.

Methods: From December 2018 to November 2019, a prospective observational study was conducted involving Thai participants aged between 18 and 80 years. All participants were tested using standard audiometry and the uHear application in a soundproof booth and in a typical hearing environment.

Results: This study included 52 participants (12 males and 40 females). The Bland-Altman plot with the Minimal Clinical Meaningful Difference of 10 dB between standard audiometry and the uHear in a soundproof booth found agreement at 2000 Hz. The uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity at all frequencies (82.5%-98.9%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (85.7%-100%). uHear in a typical hearing environment showed high sensitivity at 4000 and 6000 Hz (97.6%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (100%). When considering the pure-tone average, uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (90.7%), whereas, in a typical hearing environment, uHear showed poor sensitivity (34%) and high specificity (100%).

Conclusion: uHear was accurate for hearing loss screening at 2000 Hz in a soundproof booth. However, uHear in a typical hearing environment lacked accuracy. The uHear application in a soundproof booth can be used to screen hearing loss in some situations where standard audiometry is impossible.

Level Of Evidence: II.

Citing Articles

A study on the IOS application "uHear" as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok.

Bunnag K, Kaewsalubsri W, Junthong S, Kulthaveesup A Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023; 8(1):253-261.

PMID: 36846435 PMC: 9948572. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.996.

References
1.
Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi M, Kolethekkat A, Bhargava D, Al-Alwi A, Al-Bahlani H . The Accuracy of IOS Device-based uHear as a Screening Tool for Hearing Loss: A Preliminary Study From the Middle East. Oman Med J. 2016; 31(2):142-5. PMC: 4861391. DOI: 10.5001/omj.2016.27. View

2.
Clark J . Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA. 1981; 23(7):493-500. View

3.
Hajian-Tilaki K . Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014; 48:193-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. View

4.
Prasansuk S . Incidence/prevalence of sensorineural hearing impairment in Thailand and Southeast Asia. Audiology. 2000; 39(4):207-11. View

5.
Bunnag C, Prasansuk S, Nakorn A, Jareoncharsri P, Atipas S, Angsuwarangsee T . Ear diseases and hearing in the Thai elderly population. Part I. A comparative study of the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment by general practitioners vs ENT specialists. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002; 85(5):521-31. View