» Articles » PMID: 36845550

Companion Diagnostic Requirements for Spatial Biology Using Multiplex Immunofluorescence and Multispectral Imaging

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Feb 27
PMID 36845550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immunohistochemistry has long been held as the gold standard for understanding the expression patterns of therapeutically relevant proteins to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Patient selection for targeted therapy in oncology has successfully relied upon standard microscopy-based methodologies, such as single-marker brightfield chromogenic immunohistochemistry. As promising as these results are, the analysis of one protein, with few exceptions, no longer provides enough information to draw effective conclusions about the probability of treatment response. More multifaceted scientific queries have driven the development of high-throughput and high-order technologies to interrogate biomarker expression patterns and spatial interactions between cell phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment. Such multi-parameter data analysis has been historically reserved for technologies that lack the spatial context that is provided by immunohistochemistry. Over the past decade, technical developments in multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry and discoveries made with improving image data analysis platforms have highlighted the importance of spatial relationships between certain biomarkers in understanding a patient's likelihood to respond to, typically, immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the same time, personalized medicine has instigated changes in both clinical trial design and its conduct in a push to make drug development and cancer treatment more efficient, precise, and economical. Precision medicine in immuno-oncology is being steered by data-driven approaches to gain insight into the tumor and its dynamic interaction with the immune system. This is particularly necessary given the rapid growth in the number of trials involving more than one immune checkpoint drug, and/or using those in combination with conventional cancer treatments. As multiplex methods, like immunofluorescence, push the boundaries of immunohistochemistry, it becomes critical to understand the foundation of this technology and how it can be deployed for use as a regulated test to identify the prospect of response from mono- and combination therapies. To that end, this work will focus on: 1) the scientific, clinical, and economic requirements for developing clinical multiplex immunofluorescence assays; 2) the attributes of the Akoya Phenoptics workflow to support predictive tests, including design principles, verification, and validation needs; 3) regulatory, safety and quality considerations; 4) application of multiplex immunohistochemistry through lab-developed-tests and regulated diagnostic devices.

Citing Articles

RNAscope Multiplex FISH Signal Assessment in FFPE and Fresh Frozen Tissues: The Effect of Archival Duration on RNA Expression.

Sari A, Copeland K, Nuwongsri P, Pipatsakulroj W, Jinawath A, Israsena N J Histochem Cytochem. 2025; 73(1-2):9-28.

PMID: 39844680 PMC: 11755420. DOI: 10.1369/00221554241311971.


An Approach to Include the Cost of Consumables in Biochemistry Analyzer Procurement on the Reagent Rental Model Alleviates Hidden Expenses.

Kulshrestha M, Tiwari V, Singh S, Pathak A EJIFCC. 2024; 35(3):182-188.

PMID: 39507579 PMC: 11536279.


Spatially resolved tissue imaging to analyze the tumor immune microenvironment: beyond cell-type densities.

Lopez Janeiro A, Wong E, Jimenez-Sanchez D, Ortiz de Solorzano C, Lozano M, Teijeira A J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38821717 PMC: 11149121. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008589.


Redefining clinical practice through spatial profiling: a revolution in tissue analysis.

Mulholland E, Leedham S Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024; 106(4):305-312.

PMID: 38555868 PMC: 10981989. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0091.


Image-based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer.

Jahangir C, Page D, Broeckx G, Gonzalez C, Burke C, Murphy C J Pathol. 2024; 262(3):271-288.

PMID: 38230434 PMC: 11288342. DOI: 10.1002/path.6238.


References
1.
Hammond M, Barker P, Taube S, Gutman S . Standard reference material for Her2 testing: report of a National Institute of Standards and Technology-sponsored Consensus Workshop. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2003; 11(2):103-6. View

2.
McNamara G, Lucas J, Beeler J, Basavanhally A, Lee G, Hedvat C . New Technologies to Image Tumors. Cancer Treat Res. 2020; 180:51-94. PMC: 8370749. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38862-1_2. View

3.
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre C, Kwok I, Ng L . Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2018; . DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4314. View

4.
Hendriks L, Rouleau E, Besse B . Clinical utility of tumor mutational burden in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018; 7(6):647-660. PMC: 6249615. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.09.22. View

5.
Taube J, Akturk G, Angelo M, Engle E, Gnjatic S, Greenbaum S . The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer statement on best practices for multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining and validation. J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8(1). PMC: 7239569. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000155. View