» Articles » PMID: 36833077

Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36833077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) and unfavorable Bishop score are still controversial. A retrospective cohort study was performed across six tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Women with one previous transverse CS, singleton cephalic term pregnancy and BS < 6 were included if submitted to labor induction with a CRB. The main outcome was the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) after CRB ripening. Secondary outcomes were abnormal composite fetal and maternal outcomes. Of the 265 women included, 57.3% had successful vaginal birth. Augmentation improved vaginal delivery (32.2% vs. 21.2%). Intrapartum analgesia was associated with an increased VBAC rate (58.6% vs. 34.5%). Maternal BMI ≥30 and age ≥40 years increased emergency CS rate (11.8% vs. 28.3% and 7.2 vs. 15.9%). Composite adverse maternal outcome occurred in 4.8% of CRB group women and increased to 17.6% when associated with oxytocin. Uterine rupture occurred in one case (0.4%) in the CRB-oxytocin group. Poorer fetal outcome occurred after emergency CS, if compared to successful VBAC (12.4% vs. 3.3%). In women with a previous CS and unfavorable Bishop score, induction of labor with a CRB can be considered safe and effective.

Citing Articles

May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study.

Frykman J, Nilsson E, Wiberg-Itzel E, Wallstrom T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024; 104(1):194-202.

PMID: 39526317 PMC: 11683529. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15005.


Duration time of labor progression for pregnant women of vaginal birth after cesarean in Hubei, China.

Li H, Yang L, Peng J, Cheng W, Ma H, Wu S Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(3):1351-1358.

PMID: 38169049 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03600-6.

References
1.
Ande A, Ezeanochie C, Olagbuji N . Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 285(4):967-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2094-4. View

2.
Gallagher L, Gardner B, Rahman M, Schoen C, Connolly K, Hankins G . Cervical Ripening Using Foley Balloon with or without Oxytocin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2018; 36(4):406-421. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668577. View

3.
. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(3):693-711. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d. View

4.
. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133(2):e110-e127. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078. View

5.
Landon M, Leindecker S, Spong C, Hauth J, Bloom S, Varner M . The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066. View