» Articles » PMID: 21272849

Is Transcervical Foley Catheter Actually Slower Than Prostaglandins in Ripening the Cervix? A Randomized Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2011 Jan 29
PMID 21272849
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the maximum time for cervical ripening (from 24-12 hours) would influence the efficacy of a transcervical Foley catheter and to compare efficacy to that of a prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.

Study Design: Three hundred ninety-seven women were assigned randomly to (1) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 24 hours, (2) Foley catheter left in place for a maximum of 12 hours, or (3) prostaglandin E(2) controlled-release vaginal insert. Primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours.

Results: There were no differences in vaginal delivery rates. The proportion of women who achieved vaginal delivery in 24 hours was lower in the 24-hour Foley catheter group than in the other 2 groups (24-hour Foley catheter, 21.0%; 12-hour Foley catheter, 59.8%; vaginal prostaglandin E(2), 48.5%; P < .0001).

Conclusion: Cutting the ripening time with a Foley catheter by one-half increases the proportion of women who deliver vaginally within 24 hours and yields efficacy similar to that of prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date.

Tamai J, Ikenoue S, Akita K, Fukuma Y, Tanaka Y, Hasegawa K J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024; 50(12):2226-2230.

PMID: 39400965 PMC: 11608843. DOI: 10.1111/jog.16123.


Duration of double balloon catheter for patients with prior cesarean: a before and after study.

Tang R, Bode L, Baugh K, Mosesso K, Daggy J, Guise D AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(3):100378.

PMID: 39219702 PMC: 11364268. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100378.


Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

de Vaan M, Ten Eikelder M, Jozwiak M, Palmer K, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp K Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 3:CD001233.

PMID: 36996264 PMC: 10061553. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.


Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Germano C, Mappa I, Cromi A, Busato E, Incerti M, Lojacono A Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(4).

PMID: 36833077 PMC: 9956585. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040543.


Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhao G, Song G, Liu J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):688.

PMID: 36068489 PMC: 9450369. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04988-2.