Combined 3D Endoanal Ultrasound and Transperineal Ultrasound Improves the Detection of Anal Sphincter Defects

Overview

Journal Diagnostics (Basel)

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Feb 25

PMID 36832170

Authors

Dan Carter

Edward Ram

Tal Engel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Anal sphincter injury, mainly due to obstetric or iatrogenic etiology, is the most common cause of fecal incontinence (FI). Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D EAUS) is used for assessment of the integrity and the degree of anal muscle injury. However, 3D EAUS accuracy may be hampered by regional acoustic effects, such as intravaginal air. Therefore, our aim was to examine whether a combination of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) and 3D EAUS would improve the accuracy of detection of anal sphincter injury.

Methods: We prospectively performed 3D EAUS followed by TPUS in every patient evaluated for FI in our clinic between January 2020 and January 2021. The diagnosis of anal muscle defects was assessed in each ultrasound technique by two experienced observers that were blinded to each other's assessments. Interobserver agreement for the results of the 3D EAUS and the TPUS exams was examined. A final diagnosis of anal sphincter defect was based on the results of both ultrasound methods. Discordant results were re-analyzed by the two ultrasonographers for a final consensus on the presence or absence of defects.

Results: A total of 108 patients underwent ultrasonographic assessment due to FI (mean age 69 ± 13). Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of tear on EAUS and TPUS was high (83%) with Cohen's kappa of 0.62. EAUS confirmed anal muscle defects in 56 patients (52%), while TPUS confirmed them in 62 patients (57%). The final consensus agreed on the diagnosis of 63 (58%) muscular defects and 45 (42%) normal exams. The Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement between the results of the 3D EAUS and the final consensus was 0.63.

Conclusions: The combination of 3D EAUS and TPUS improved the detection of anal muscular defects. The application of both techniques for the assessment of the anal integrity should be considered in every patient going through ultrasonographic assessment for anal muscular injury.

Citing Articles

Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Guiding Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in an Incontinent Patient without Suture Dehiscence.

Orsi M, Cappuccio G, Kurihara H, Rossi G, Perugino G, Ferrazzi E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201377 PMC: 10804317. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010068.

References

Bartram C, Sultan A . Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut. 1995; 37(1):4-6. PMC: 1382758. DOI: 10.1136/gut.37.1.4. View

LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A . Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015; 60(1):37-47. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12283. View

Bharucha A, Zinsmeister A, Locke G, Seide B, McKeon K, Schleck C . Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129(1):42-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006. View

Whitehead W, Borrud L, Goode P, Meikle S, Mueller E, Tuteja A . Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137(2):512-7, 517.e1-2. PMC: 2748224. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054. View

Speksnijder L, Oom D, DE Leeuw J, Steensma A . Which factors are associated with anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 58(3):476-482. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23525. View

Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan A . National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25(12):1621-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x. View

Weinstein M, Pretorius D, Jung S, Nager C, Mittal R . Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 7(2):205-11. PMC: 2835972. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.019. View

Zbar A, Horesh N, Bucholtz V, Zmora O, Beer-Gabel M, Carter D . Are there specific endosonographic features in Crohn's patients with perianal fistulae?. J Crohns Colitis. 2012; 7(6):490-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.07.024. View

Landy H, Laughon S, Bailit J, Kominiarek M, Gonzalez-Quintero V, Ramirez M . Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(3):627-635. PMC: 3132187. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2. View

10.

Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L, Mahmood T, Adams E, Richmond D . Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013; 120(12):1516-25. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12363. View

11.

Stuart A, Ignell C, Orno A . Comparison of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound in detecting residual obstetric anal sphincter injury. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98(12):1624-1631. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13701. View

12.

Nevler A . The epidemiology of anal incontinence and symptom severity scoring. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014; 2(2):79-84. PMC: 4020123. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gou005. View

13.

Martinez Franco E, Ros C, Santoro G, Cassado Garriga J, Amat Tardiu L, Cuadras D . Transperineal anal sphincter complex evaluation after obstetric anal sphincter injuries: With or without tomographic ultrasound imaging technique?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 257:70-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.009. View

14.

Nuernberg D, Saftoiu A, Barreiros A, Burmester E, Ivan E, Clevert D . EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Int Open. 2019; 5(1):E34-E51. PMC: 6363590. DOI: 10.1055/a-0825-6708. View

15.

Cornelia L, Stephan B, Michel B, Antoine W, Felix K . Trans-perineal versus endo-anal ultrasound in the detection of anal sphincter tears. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 103(1):79-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00021-0. View

16.

Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Matthews R, Assassa R, Dallosso H . Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut. 2002; 50(4):480-4. PMC: 1773171. DOI: 10.1136/gut.50.4.480. View

17.

Rostaminia G, White D, Quiroz L, Shobeiri S . 3D pelvic floor ultrasound findings and severity of anal incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 25(5):623-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2278-5. View

18.

Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery K, Abrams P, Donovan J . Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ-B. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54(10):1235-50. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182272128. View

19.

Roche B, Deleaval J, Fransioli A, Marti M . Comparison of transanal and external perineal ultrasonography. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(7):1165-70. DOI: 10.1007/s003300000702. View

20.

JORGE J, Wexner S . Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36(1):77-97. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050307. View