Prevalence of Faecal Incontinence in Adults Aged 40 Years or More Living in the Community

Overview

Journal Gut

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2002 Mar 13

PMID 11889066

Citations 105

Authors

S Perry

C Shaw

C McGrother

R J Matthews

R P Assassa

H Dallosso

K Williams

K R Brittain

U Azam

M Clarke

C Jagger

C Mayne

C M Castleden

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Prevalence studies of faecal incontinence in the general population are rare and the impact of faecal incontinence on quality of life has not been previously addressed.

Aims: To establish the prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults in terms of frequency of leakage, degree of soiling, and level of impact on quality of life.

Methods: In a cross sectional postal survey, 15 904 adults aged 40 years or more (excluding residents of nursing and residential homes) were selected randomly by household from the Leicestershire Health Authority patient register. Participants were asked to complete a confidential health questionnaire. Major faecal incontinence was defined as soiling of underwear or worse with a frequency of several times a month or more. Respondents were also asked if bowel symptoms had an impact on their quality of life.

Results: From a total sample of 10 116 respondents, 1.4% reported major faecal incontinence and 0.7% major faecal incontinence with bowel symptoms that had an impact on quality of life. Major faecal incontinence was significantly associated with a lot of impact on quality of life (odds ratio 12.4, 95% confidence interval 7.5-20.6). Incontinence was more prevalent and more severe in older people but there was no significant difference between men and women.

Conclusions: This study has confirmed that faecal incontinence is a fairly common symptom, particularly in older people. Faecal incontinence in men has received little attention in the past and the results from this study indicate that it is as much of a problem in men as it is in women while the level of unmet need in this group is high. Estimates of need for health care for this symptom should be multidimensional and assess both the severity of symptoms and the impact it has on quality of life.

Citing Articles

Digital Gut-Directed CBT May Improve Fecal Incontinence in IBS.

Varma S, Scott L, Sibelli A, Pathipati M, Griser A, Staller K Dig Dis Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 39953183 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-025-08871-w.

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions delivered at home for urinary and faecal incontinence with homebound older people: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Buck J, Fromings Hill J, Collins R, Booth J, Fleming J Age Ageing. 2024; 53(6).

PMID: 38941119 PMC: 11212545. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae126.

Improved diagnosis of faecal incontinence in the gastroenterology domain: The time to act has come.

Savarino E, Chiarioni G United European Gastroenterol J. 2024; 12(4):425-426.

PMID: 38329403 PMC: 11091767. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12546.

Global Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mack I, Hahn H, Godel C, Enck P, Bharucha A Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 22(4):712-731.e8.

PMID: 37734583 PMC: 10948379. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.09.004.

The effect of Trolox on the rabbit anal sphincterotomy repair.

Sarveazad A, Yari A, Imani F, Fayyaz F, Mokhtare M, Babaei-Ghazani A BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):209.

PMID: 37337166 PMC: 10280897. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02842-z.

References

Rockwood T, Church J, Fleshman J, Kane R, Mavrantonis C, Thorson A . Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02237236. View

Vaizey C, Carapeti E, Cahill J, Kamm M . Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1998; 44(1):77-80. PMC: 1760067. DOI: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77. View

Fynes M, DONNELLY V, Behan M, OConnell P, OHerlihy C . Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. Lancet. 1999; 354(9183):983-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11205-9. View

MacArthur C, Bick D, Keighley M . Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104(1):46-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10648.x. View

Groutz A, Fait G, Lessing J, David M, Wolman I, Jaffa A . Incidence and obstetric risk factors of postpartum anal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999; 34(3):315-8. DOI: 10.1080/00365529950173753. View

Lagaay A, van Asperen I, HIJMANS W . The prevalence of morbidity in the oldest old, aged 85 and over: a population-based survey in Leiden, The Netherlands. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1992; 15(2):115-31. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4943(92)90012-s. View

Talley N, OKeefe E, Zinsmeister A, Melton 3rd L . Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1992; 102(3):895-901. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90175-x. View

Enck P, Bielefeldt K, Rathmann W, Purrmann J, Tschope D, Erckenbrecht J . Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991; 6(3):143-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00341234. View

Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Dolk A, Norman M, Mellgren A . Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106(4):324-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08269.x. View

10.

Tilvis R, Hakala S, Valvanne J, Erkinjuntti T . Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death and institutionalization in a general aged population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1995; 21(3):307-15. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4943(95)00670-g. View

11.

Hellstrom L, Ekelund P, Milsom I, Skoog I . The influence of dementia on the prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence in 85-year-old men and women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1994; 19(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4943(94)90021-3. View

12.

Leigh R, Turnberg L . Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet. 1982; 1(8285):1349-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92413-8. View

13.

Peet S, Castleden C, McGrother C . Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence in hospitals and residential and nursing homes for older people. BMJ. 1995; 311(7012):1063-4. PMC: 2551367. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1063. View

14.

Thomas T, Egan M, Walgrove A, Meade T . The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med. 1984; 6(3):216-20. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043715. View

15.

Campbell A, Reinken J, McCosh L . Incontinence in the elderly: prevalence and prognosis. Age Ageing. 1985; 14(2):65-70. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/14.2.65. View

16.

Tsuji I, Whalen S, Finucane T . Predictors of nursing home placement in community-based long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43(7):761-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07046.x. View

17.

Wetle T, Scherr P, Branch L, Resnick N, Harris T, Evans D . Difficulty with holding urine among older persons in a geographically defined community: prevalence and correlates. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43(4):349-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05806.x. View

18.

OKeefe E, Talley N, Zinsmeister A, Jacobsen S . Bowel disorders impair functional status and quality of life in the elderly: a population-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995; 50(4):M184-9. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50a.4.m184. View

19.

Sanford J . Tolerance of debility in elderly dependants by supporters at home: its significance for hospital practice. Br Med J. 1975; 3(5981):471-3. PMC: 1674274. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5981.471. View

20.

Nakanishi N, Tatara K, Naramura H, Fujiwara H, Takashima Y, Fukuda H . Urinary and fecal incontinence in a community-residing older population in Japan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45(2):215-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb04511.x. View