» Articles » PMID: 36823635

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Enhances Early Dexterity Skills with the Left Non-dominant Hand: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Transl Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Feb 24
PMID 36823635
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is involved in early-phase manual dexterity skill acquisition when cognitive control processes, such as integration and complexity demands, are required. However, the effectiveness of left DLPFC transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on early-phase motor learning and whether its effectiveness depends on the cognitive demand of the target task are unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether tDCS over the left DLPFC improves non-dominant hand dexterity performance and determine if its efficacy depends on the cognitive demand of the target task.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, 70 healthy, right-handed, young adult participants were recruited. They were randomly allocated to the active tDCS (2 mA for 20 min) or sham groups and repeatedly performed the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) left-handed peg task and left-handed assembly task three times: pre-tDCS, during tDCS, and post tDCS.

Results: The final sample comprised 66 healthy young adults (mean age, 22.73 ± 1.57 years). There were significant interactions between group and time in both PPT tasks, indicating significantly higher performance of those in the active tDCS group than those in the sham group post tDCS (p < 0.001). Moreover, a greater benefit was observed in the left-handed assembly task performance than in the peg task performance (p < 0.001). No significant correlation between baseline performance and benefits from tDCS was observed in either task.

Conclusions: These results demonstrated that prefrontal tDCS significantly improved early-phase manual dexterity skill acquisition, and its benefits were greater for the task with high cognitive demands. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms of the left DLPFC in the modulation of early-phase dexterity skill acquisition.

Trial Registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry in Japan (UMIN000046868), Registered February 8, 2022 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053467.

Citing Articles

Timing of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the nondominant primary motor cortex fails to modulate cortical hemodynamic activity and improve motor sequence learning.

Jin M, Xu X, Zhang Z, Xia W, Lou X, Bai Z J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):17.

PMID: 39891195 PMC: 11783929. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01546-7.


Differing effectiveness of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: a randomized controlled trial.

Tokikuni Y, Watanabe A, Nakazono H, Miura H, Saito R, Miaowen D J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):180.

PMID: 39402554 PMC: 11472542. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01481-z.


Differences in the early stages of motor learning between visual-motor illusion and action observation.

Sakai K, Kawasaki T, Ikeda Y, Tanabe J, Matsumoto A, Amimoto K Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20054.

PMID: 37973996 PMC: 10654675. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47435-8.


Frontal two-electrode transcranial direct current stimulation protocols may not affect performance on a combined flanker Go/No-Go task.

Holczer A, Vekony T, Klivenyi P, Must A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11901.

PMID: 37488206 PMC: 10366169. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39161-y.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Buxbaum L, Shapiro A, Coslett H . Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 7):1971-85. PMC: 4065019. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu111. View

3.
Stagg C, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses Z, Matthews P, Johansen-Berg H . Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5):800-804. PMC: 3083512. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.009. View

4.
Matsuo A, Maeoka H, Hiyamizu M, Shomoto K, Morioka S, Seki K . Enhancement of precise hand movement by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2010; 22(2):78-82. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834298b3. View

5.
Hashemirad F, Zoghi M, Fitzgerald P, Jaberzadeh S . The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor sequence learning in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Cogn. 2015; 102:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.005. View