» Articles » PMID: 36818424

Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Feb 23
PMID 36818424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) occur and have the potential to impact the postoperative course. However, iAEs are underreported and are not routinely collected in the contemporary surgical literature. There is no widely utilized system for the collection of essential aspects of iAEs, and there is no established database for the standardization and dissemination of this data that likely have implications for outcomes and patient safety. The Intraoperative Complication Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration initiated a global effort to address these shortcomings, and the establishment of an adverse event data collection system is an essential step. In this study, we present the core-set variables for collecting iAEs that were based on the globally validated ICARUS criteria for surgical/interventional and anesthesiologic intraoperative adverse event collection and reporting.

Material And Methods: This article includes three tools to capture the essential aspects of iAEs. The core-set variables were developed from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting iAEs (item 1). Next, the summary table was developed to guide researchers in summarizing the accumulated iAE data in item 1 (item 2). Finally, this article includes examples of the method and results sections to include in a manuscript reporting iAE data (item 3). Then, 5 scenarios demonstrating best practices for completing items 1-3 were presented both in prose and in a video produced by the ICARUS collaboration.

Dissemination: This article provides the surgical community with the tools for collecting essential iAE data. The ICARUS collaboration has already published the 13 criteria for reporting surgical adverse events, but this article is unique and essential as it actually provides the tools for iAE collection. The study team plans to collect feedback for future directions of adverse event collection and reporting.

Highlights: This article represents a novel, fully-encompassing system for the data collection of intraoperative adverse events.The presented core-set variables for reporting intraoperative adverse events are not based solely on our opinion, but rather are synthesized from the globally validated ICARUS criteria for reporting intraoperative adverse events.Together, the included text, figures, and ICARUS collaboration-produced video should equip any surgeon, anesthesiologist, or nurse with the tools to properly collect intraoperative adverse event data.Future directions include translation of this article to allow for the widest possible adoption of this important collection system.

Citing Articles

A nomogram predicting intraoperative adverse events during minimally invasive radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy.

Chen K, Yu L, Ge L, Deng S, Zhang F, Wang G Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(10):5891-5902.

PMID: 39168857 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11041-0.


Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.

Sotelo R, Sayegh A, Medina L, Perez L, La Riva A, Eppler M BJS Open. 2024; 8(4).

PMID: 38987232 PMC: 11236483. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056.


A Comprehensive Overview of Intraoperative Complications during Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Single Series from High-Volume Center.

Olivero A, Tappero S, Chierigo F, Maltzman O, Secco S, Palagonia E Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38611063 PMC: 11010834. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071385.


Development of Bleeding Artificial Intelligence Detector (BLAIR) System for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

Checcucci E, Piazzolla P, Marullo G, Innocente C, Salerno F, Ulrich L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068407 PMC: 10707655. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237355.


Risk Prediction Models for Peri-Operative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery with Particular Focus on Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.

Grandi A, Bertoglio L, Lepidi S, Kolbel T, Mani K, Budtz-Lilly J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17).

PMID: 37685573 PMC: 10488165. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175505.

References
1.
Cacciamani G, Sholklapper T, Sotelo R, Desai M, Gill I . A Protocol for the Development of the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards Criteria: The ICARUS Project. Int J Surg Protoc. 2021; 25(1):160-164. PMC: 8344953. DOI: 10.29337/ijsp.155. View

2.
Cacciamani G, Sholklapper T, Delloglio P, Rocco B, Annino F, Antonelli A . The Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration Project: Development of Criteria for Reporting Adverse Events During Surgical Procedures and Evaluating Their Impact on the.... Eur Urol Focus. 2022; 8(6):1847-1858. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018. View

3.
Jin Y, Sanger N, Shams I, Luo C, Shahid H, Li G . Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018; 11:495-510. PMC: 6166749. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S155103. View

4.
Gandaglia G, Bravi C, Delloglio P, Mazzone E, Fossati N, Scuderi S . The Impact of Implementation of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications on Perioperative Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018; 74(1):4-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.025. View

5.
. Assessing, grading, and reporting intraoperative adverse events during and after surgery. Br J Surg. 2021; 109(4):301-302. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab438. View