» Articles » PMID: 36810878

Women's Preconception Health in England: a Report Card Based on Cross-sectional Analysis of National Maternity Services Data from 2018/2019

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2023 Feb 22
PMID 36810878
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To present the first national-level report card on the state of women's preconception health in England.

Design: Cross-sectional population-based study.

Setting: Maternity services, England.

Population: All pregnant women in England with a first antenatal (booking) appointment recorded in the national Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) from April 2018 to March 2019 (n = 652 880).

Methods: We analysed the prevalence of 32 preconception indicator measures in the overall population and across socio-demographic subgroups. Ten of these indicators were prioritised for ongoing surveillance based on modifiability, prevalence, data quality and ranking by multidisciplinary UK experts.

Results: The three most prevalent indicators were the proportion of the 22.9% of women who smoked 1 year before pregnancy who did not quit smoking before pregnancy (85.0%), those who had not taken folic acid supplementation before pregnancy (72.7%) and previous pregnancy loss (38.9%). Inequalities were observed by age, ethnicity and area-based deprivation level. The ten indicators prioritised were not taking folic acid supplementation before pregnancy, obesity, complex social factors, living in the most deprived areas, smoking around the time of conception, overweight, pre-existing mental health condition, pre-existing physical health condition, previous pregnancy loss and previous obstetric complication.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest important opportunities to improve the state of preconception health and reduce socio-demographic inequalities for women in England. In addition to MSDS data, other national data sources that record further and possibly better quality indicators could be explored and linked to build a comprehensive surveillance infrastructure.

Citing Articles

Preconception health in adolescence and adulthood across generations in the UK: Findings from three British birth cohort studies.

Righton O, Flynn A, Alwan N, Schoenaker D PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0299061.

PMID: 39661574 PMC: 11633974. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299061.


Developing consensus on priorities for preconception care in the general practice setting in the UK: Study protocol.

Schoenaker D, Lovegrove E, Santer M, Matvienko-Sikar K, Carr H, Alwan N PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311578.

PMID: 39570956 PMC: 11581211. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311578.


What Does 'Preconception Health' Mean to People? A Public Consultation on Awareness and Use of Language.

Schoenaker D, Gafari O, Taylor E, Hall J, Barker C, Jones B Health Expect. 2024; 27(4):e14181.

PMID: 39180340 PMC: 11344208. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14181.


Preconception health among migrant women in England: A cross-sectional analysis of maternity services data 2018-2019.

McGranahan M, Augarde E, Schoenaker D, Duncan H, Mann S, Bick D J Migr Health. 2024; 10:100250.

PMID: 39156886 PMC: 11327935. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100250.


Preconception indicators and associations with health outcomes reported in UK routine primary care data: a systematic review.

Schoenaker D, Lovegrove E, Lovegrove E, Cassinelli E, Cassinelli E, Hall J Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 75(751):e129-e136.

PMID: 38950944 PMC: 11755573. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0082.


References
1.
Dorney E, Boyle J, Walker R, Hammarberg K, Musgrave L, Schoenaker D . A Systematic Review of Clinical Guidelines for Preconception Care. Semin Reprod Med. 2022; 40(3-04):157-169. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748190. View

2.
Inskip H, Crozier S, Baird J, Hammond J, Robinson S, Cooper C . Measured weight in early pregnancy is a valid method for estimating pre-pregnancy weight. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2020; 12(4):561-569. DOI: 10.1017/S2040174420000926. View

3.
Fleming T, Watkins A, Velazquez M, Mathers J, Prentice A, Stephenson J . Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet. 2018; 391(10132):1842-1852. PMC: 5975952. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30312-X. View

4.
Kent L, Cardwell C, Young I, Eastwood K . Trends in maternal body mass index in Northern Ireland: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Fam Med Community Health. 2021; 9(4). PMC: 8710425. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001310. View

5.
DAngelo D, Williams L, Morrow B, Cox S, Harris N, Harrison L . Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007; 56(10):1-35. View