» Articles » PMID: 36795422

Temporal Encoding: Relative and Absolute Representations of Time Guide Behavior

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Temporal information-processing is critical for adaptive behavior and goal-directed action. It is thus crucial to understand how the temporal distance between behaviorally relevant events is encoded to guide behavior. However, research on temporal representations has yielded mixed findings as to whether organisms utilize relative versus absolute judgments of time intervals. To address this fundamental question about the timing mechanism, we tested mice in a duration discrimination procedure in which they learned to correctly categorize tones of different durations as short or long. After being trained on a pair of target intervals, the mice were transferred to conditions in which cue durations and corresponding response locations were systematically manipulated so that either the relative or absolute mapping remained constant. The findings indicate that transfer occurred most readily when relative relationships of durations and response locations were preserved. In contrast, when subjects had to re-map these relative relations, even when positive transfer initially occurred based on absolute mappings, their temporal discrimination performance was impaired, and they required extensive training to re-establish temporal control. These results demonstrate that mice can represent experienced durations both as having a certain magnitude (absolute representation) and as being shorter or longer of the two durations (an ordinal relation to other cue durations), with relational control having a more enduring influence in temporal discriminations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Time-scale invariant contingency yields one-shot reinforcement learning despite extremely long delays to reinforcement.

Gallistel C, Shahan T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(30):e2405451121.

PMID: 39008663 PMC: 11287270. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2405451121.


Temporal scaling and computing time in neural circuits: Should we stop watching the clock and look for its gears?.

De Corte B, Akdogan B, Balsam P Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:1022713.

PMID: 36570701 PMC: 9773401. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1022713.


Slow motion bias: Exploring the relation between time overestimation and increased perceived intentionality.

Huttner N, Sperl L, Schroeger A Perception. 2022; 52(2):77-96.

PMID: 36471555 PMC: 9837152. DOI: 10.1177/03010066221139943.

References
1.
Karmarkar U, Buonomano D . Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states. Neuron. 2007; 53(3):427-38. PMC: 1857310. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.006. View

2.
Balci F, Gallistel C, Allen B, Frank K, Gibson J, Brunner D . Acquisition of peak responding: what is learned?. Behav Processes. 2008; 80(1):67-75. PMC: 2634850. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.010. View

3.
Gibbon J, Church R, Meck W . Scalar timing in memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984; 423:52-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x. View

4.
STEVENS S . On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 2010; 103(2684):677-80. View

5.
Matell M, Meck W, Nicolelis M . Interval timing and the encoding of signal duration by ensembles of cortical and striatal neurons. Behav Neurosci. 2003; 117(4):760-73. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.4.760. View