» Articles » PMID: 36793316

Predictors of Surgical Site Infection Following Reconstructive Flap Surgery: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 37,177 Patients

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Feb 16
PMID 36793316
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Rates of surgical site infection (SSI) following reconstructive flap surgeries (RFS) vary according to flap recipient site, potentially leading to flap failure. This is the largest study to determine predictors of SSI following RFS across recipient sites.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing any flap procedure from years 2005 to 2020. RFS involving grafts, skin flaps, or flaps with unknown recipient site were excluded. Patients were stratified according to recipient site: breast, trunk, head and neck (H&N), upper and lower extremities (UE&LE). The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within 30 days following surgery. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine predictors of SSI following RFS.

Results: 37,177 patients underwent RFS, of whom 7.5% (= 2,776) developed SSI. A significantly greater proportion of patients who underwent LE (= 318, 10.7%) and trunk (= 1,091, 10.4%) reconstruction developed SSI compared to those who underwent breast (= 1,201, 6.3%), UE (= 32, 4.4%), and H&N (= 100, 4.2%) reconstruction ( < .001). Longer operating times were significant predictors of SSI following RFS across all sites. The strongest predictors of SSI were presence of open wound following trunk and H&N reconstruction [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 (1.57-2.11) and 1.75 (1.57-1.95)], disseminated cancer following LE reconstruction [aOR (CI) 3.58 (2.324-5.53)], and history of cardiovascular accident or stroke following breast reconstruction [aOR (CI) 16.97 (2.72-105.82)].

Conclusion: Longer operating time was a significant predictor of SSI regardless of reconstruction site. Reducing operating times through proper surgical planning might help mitigate the risk of SSI following RFS. Our findings should be used to guide patient selection, counseling, and surgical planning prior to RFS.

Citing Articles

"Y" Configuration of the Arterial Pedicle or the Use of a Saphenous Vein Graft for Microsurgical Reconstruction in the Old and Diseased-A Retrospective Study.

Moshammer M, Hecker A, Watzinger N, Pignet A, Martin R, Weigel G J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797239 PMC: 11721738. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010157.


Are There Differences in Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes Among Surgical Subspecialists Performing Lower Extremity Flap Procedures? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Analysis of 1324 Patients.

Park A, McKegg P, Brigode W Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024; :22925503241263358.

PMID: 39553509 PMC: 11562352. DOI: 10.1177/22925503241263358.

References
1.
Fischer J, Tuggle C, Au A, Kovach S . A 30-day risk assessment of mastectomy alone compared to immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013; 48(3):209-15. DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.865633. View

2.
Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P, Raposio E . Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017; 21(11):2572-2585. View

3.
Toma O, Suntrup P, Stefanescu A, London A, Mutch M, Kharasch E . Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection. Anesth Analg. 2011; 113(4):730-7. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821fff74. View

4.
Chung C, Wink J, Nelson J, Fischer J, Serletti J, Kanchwala S . Surgical Site Infections after Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of 2,899 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Datasets. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015; 31(6):434-41. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548739. View

5.
McRobert J . Smoking and its effects on the healing process of chronic wounds. Br J Community Nurs. 2013; Suppl:S18, S20-3. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2013.18.sup3.s18. View