» Articles » PMID: 36781438

Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the External Auditory Canal: Proposal for a Refined T-stage Classification System

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 13
PMID 36781438
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Although adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the external auditory canal (EAC) has a different pathophysiology from squamous cell carcinoma, the same staging system is used. The aim of this study was to propose a refined staging system, which is more suitable for ACC of the EAC.

Methods: A total of 25 patients who were diagnosed with ACC of the EAC were reviewed. The modified Pittsburgh staging system (mPSS) that is universally used for temporal bone malignancy was refined for ACC (rPSS). The limited (< 0.5 cm) lateral soft tissue involvement was classified as T1 and extensive (≥ 0.5 cm) lateral soft tissue involvement as T2. The disease-free survival rate (DFSR) was assessed in the patients who underwent surgical treatment according to two staging systems; mPSS and rPSS.

Results: When staging using mPSS, most patients (96.0%, n = 24) were classified as T4. However, when rPSS was used, T1, T2, T3, and T4 stage occupied 36.0% (n = 9), 40.0% (n = 10), 12.0% (n = 3), 12.0% (n = 3), respectively. There was no difference in DFSR according to the T stage using mPSS (p = 0.466). However, when rPSS was used, the DFSR showed significant correlation with the T stage (p = 0.032).

Conclusions: Clinical T stage of mPSS was not sufficient to predict survival rate in ACC of the EAC, and we propose that the information on the lateral soft tissue involvement needs to be added to the existing staging system.

References
1.
Testa J, Fukuda Y, Kowalski L . Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123(7):720-4. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900070064010. View

2.
Dong F, Gidley P, Ho T, Luna M, Ginsberg L, Sturgis E . Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope. 2008; 118(9):1591-6. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817c42a8. View

3.
SPIRO R, Huvos A . Stage means more than grade in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992; 164(6):623-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80721-4. View

4.
Jiang X, Jia L, Zhang X, Zhong C, Tang F, Chen X . Clinical experience of 23 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the external auditory canal. Oncol Lett. 2020; 20(5):144. PMC: 7471729. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12005. View

5.
Morita S, Mizumachi T, Nakamaru Y, Sakashita T, Kano S, Hoshino K . Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018; 23(6):1029-1037. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1314-3. View