» Articles » PMID: 36762579

Sex Differences in Response to Lifestyle Intervention Among Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Little is known about sex differences in response to lifestyle interventions among pediatric populations. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate sex differences in adiposity following lifestyle interventions among children and adolescents with overweight or obesity aged 6 to 18 years old.

Methods: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE (from inception to March 2021), and references from included articles were examined. Eligibility criteria included children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years with overweight or obesity, randomization to a lifestyle intervention versus a control group, and assessment of at least one adiposity measure. Corresponding authors were contacted to obtain summary statistics by sex (n = 14/49).

Results: Of 89 full-text articles reviewed, 49 (55%) were included, of which 33 (67%) reported statistically significant intervention effects on adiposity. Only two studies (4%) evaluated sex differences in response to lifestyle intervention, reporting conflicting results. The results of the meta-regression models demonstrated no significant differences in the treatment effect between male and female youth for weight (beta = -0.05, SE = 0.18, z = -0.28, p = 0.8), BMI (beta = 0.03, SE = 0.14, z = 0.19, p = 0.85), BMI z score (beta = -0.04, SE = 0.18, z = -0.23, p = 0.82), percentage body fat (beta = -0.11, SE = 0.16, z = -0.67, p = 0.51), and waist circumference (beta = -0.30, SE = 0.25, z = -1.18, p = 0.24).

Conclusions: The meta-analysis revealed that youth with overweight or obesity do not demonstrate a differential response to lifestyle intervention in relation to adiposity-related outcomes.

Citing Articles

The effect of education based on the theory of planned behavior to prevent the consumption of fast food in a population of teenagers.

Rakhshani T, Asadi S, Kashfi S, Sohrabi Z, Kamyab A, Jeihooni A J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):147.

PMID: 39289771 PMC: 11406770. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00640-1.


An examination of the predictors of change in BMI among 38 026 school students in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Banany M, Gebel K, Sibbritt D Int Health. 2024; 16(4):463-467.

PMID: 38578607 PMC: 11218882. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae029.


Sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and in response to lifestyle intervention in prepubertal and pubertal subjects with obesity.

Gilardini L, Croci M, Cavaggioni L, Pasqualinotto L, Bertoli S Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1304451.

PMID: 38410765 PMC: 10895017. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1304451.

References
1.
Nemet D, Barkan S, Epstein Y, Friedland O, Kowen G, Eliakim A . Short- and long-term beneficial effects of a combined dietary-behavioral-physical activity intervention for the treatment of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2005; 115(4):e443-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2172. View

2.
Johnson W, Hinkle L, Carr R, Anderson D, Lemmon C, Engler L . Dietary and exercise interventions for juvenile obesity: long-term effect of behavioral and public health models. Obes Res. 1997; 5(3):257-61. DOI: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00300.x. View

3.
Diaz R, Esparza-Romero J, Moya-Camarena S, Robles-Sardin A, Valencia M . Lifestyle intervention in primary care settings improves obesity parameters among Mexican youth. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110(2):285-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.042. View

4.
Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Wolf Linhard D, Nagelberg N, Poraz I, Shalitin S, Phillip M . Intervention for childhood obesity based on parents only or parents and child compared with follow-up alone. Pediatr Obes. 2018; 13(11):647-655. DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12263. View

5.
Pettitt D, Talton J, Dabelea D, Divers J, Imperatore G, Lawrence J . Prevalence of diabetes in U.S. youth in 2009: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37(2):402-8. PMC: 3898760. DOI: 10.2337/dc13-1838. View