» Articles » PMID: 36761300

Rational Design of Enzyme Activity and Enantioselectivity

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 10
PMID 36761300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The strategy of rational design to engineer enzymes is to predict the potential mutants based on the understanding of the relationships between protein structure and function, and subsequently introduce the mutations using the site-directed mutagenesis. Rational design methods are universal, relatively fast and have the potential to be developed into algorithms that can quantitatively predict the performance of the designed sequences. Compared to the protein stability, it was more challenging to design an enzyme with improved activity or selectivity, due to the complexity of enzyme molecular structure and inadequate understanding of the relationships between enzyme structures and functions. However, with the development of computational force, advanced algorithm and a deeper understanding of enzyme catalytic mechanisms, rational design could significantly simplify the process of engineering enzyme functions and the number of studies applying rational design strategy has been increasing. Here, we reviewed the recent advances of applying the rational design strategy to engineer enzyme functions including activity and enantioselectivity. Five strategies including multiple sequence alignment, strategy based on steric hindrance, strategy based on remodeling interaction network, strategy based on dynamics modification and computational protein design are discussed and the successful cases using these strategies are introduced.

Citing Articles

Improvement in the Thermal Stability of MHETase by Sequence and Structure-Guided Calculation.

Duan S, Chao T, Wu Y, Wei Z, Cao S Molecules. 2025; 30(5).

PMID: 40076213 PMC: 11902034. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30050988.


Enzymatic functionalization of bacterial nanocellulose: current approaches and future prospects.

Kaczmarek M, Bialkowska A J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):82.

PMID: 39905460 PMC: 11796255. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03163-x.


NAC4ED: A high-throughput computational platform for the rational design of enzyme activity and substrate selectivity.

Zhang C, Feng Y, Zhu Y, Gong L, Wei H, Zhang L mLife. 2025; 3(4):505-514.

PMID: 39744097 PMC: 11685835. DOI: 10.1002/mlf2.12154.


ProteinReDiff: Complex-based ligand-binding proteins redesign by equivariant diffusion-based generative models.

Nguyen V, Nguyen N, Hy T Struct Dyn. 2024; 11(6):064102.

PMID: 39629167 PMC: 11614476. DOI: 10.1063/4.0000271.


Mechanistic Insights into the Stimulatory Effect of Melanogenesis of 4-Methylcoumarin Derivatives in B16F10 Melanoma Cells.

Lee Y, Hyun C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596485 PMC: 11594713. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212421.


References
1.
Grisewood M, Hernandez Lozada N, Thoden J, Gifford N, Mendez-Perez D, Schoenberger H . Computational Redesign of Acyl-ACP Thioesterase with Improved Selectivity toward Medium-Chain-Length Fatty Acids. ACS Catal. 2018; 7(6):3837-3849. PMC: 5784442. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00408. View

2.
Ashworth M, Bombino E, de Jong R, Wijma H, Janssen D, McLean K . Computation-Aided Engineering of Cytochrome P450 for the Production of Pravastatin. ACS Catal. 2022; 12(24):15028-15044. PMC: 9764288. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03974. View

3.
Steiner K, Schwab H . Recent advances in rational approaches for enzyme engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2014; 2:e201209010. PMC: 3962183. DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201209010. View

4.
Kong X, Yuan S, Li L, Chen S, Xu J, Zhou J . Engineering of an epoxide hydrolase for efficient bioresolution of bulky pharmaco substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(44):15717-22. PMC: 4226085. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404915111. View

5.
Bao L, Li J, Jia C, Li M, Lu X . Structure-oriented substrate specificity engineering of aldehyde-deformylating oxygenase towards aldehydes carbon chain length. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016; 9(1):185. PMC: 5007808. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0596-9. View