» Articles » PMID: 36756537

Towards a Therapy for Geographic Atrophy: A Patient's Experience

Overview
Date 2023 Feb 9
PMID 36756537
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Geographic atrophy (GA) is the advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of age-related macular degeneration. Presently, GA cannot be treated. However, new therapies administered by intravitreal injection are in late-stage development. These can slow down, but do not stop or reverse, GA progression. The acceptability of these emerging therapies to people with GA is currently unknown. The present case study explores the perspectives of a person living with GA who took part in the terminated Phase 3 clinical trial of Lampalizumab, a candidate intravitreal treatment for GA. We explored this patient's perspective on the retrospective acceptability of regular Lampalizumab injections, and the prospective acceptability of future intravitreal therapies for GA.

Patients And Methods: A 78-year-old woman living in the UK was recruited as part of a mixed-methods pilot study and interviewed by telephone, regarding: her experience of the Lampalizumab trial injections; and her thoughts regarding emerging intravitreal therapies for GA. The Framework Method was used for initial inductive analysis of the interview transcript. Subsequently, deductive analysis was undertaken, informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA).

Results: For this participant, intravitreal injections in the Lampalizumab trial were acceptable, although streamlining processes within the clinic would have improved the patient experience. Regarding prospective acceptability of new intravitreal therapies, the participant considered a delay in progression of GA a valuable goal. Potential discomfort, anxiety and inconvenience associated with regular intravitreal injections would be acceptable in the context of preserving her vision for as long as possible.

Conclusion: Analysis of one participant's experience demonstrates the value of exploring GA patients' unique views on the acceptability of new intravitreal treatments. Larger prospective studies will provide more insight that help to optimise treatment design and delivery, thereby maximising likelihood of adherence and persistence when these therapies eventually arrive in clinic.

Citing Articles

Proliferative Sickle Cell Retinopathy: A Patient and a Physician's Perspective on Quality of Life and Quality of Eye Care.

Taylor C, Awadzi R, Enoch J, Dinah C Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(4):851-860.

PMID: 38345709 PMC: 10912386. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00893-3.

References
1.
Rosenfeld P, Brown D, Heier J, Boyer D, Kaiser P, Chung C . Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(14):1419-31. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa054481. View

2.
Joko T, Nagai Y, Mori R, Tanaka K, Oshima Y, Hikichi Y . Patient Preferences for Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Japan: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:553-567. PMC: 7082633. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S228890. View

3.
Chakravarthy U, Bailey C, Johnston R, McKibbin M, Khan R, Mahmood S . Characterizing Disease Burden and Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125(6):842-849. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.036. View

4.
Ferris 3rd F, Wilkinson C, Bird A, Chakravarthy U, Chew E, Csaky K . Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(4):844-51. PMC: 11551519. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.036. View

5.
Kovacs K, Ciulla T, Kiss S . Advancements in ocular gene therapy delivery: vectors and subretinal, intravitreal, and suprachoroidal techniques. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022; 22(9):1193-1208. DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2121646. View