» Articles » PMID: 28064517

Experiences of Patients Undergoing Repeated Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Date 2017 Jan 10
PMID 28064517
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current therapy to slow disease progression in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) entails regular intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections, often indefinitely. Little is known about the burden imposed on patients by this repetitive treatment schedule and how this can be best managed. The aim of this study was to explore the psychosocial impact of repeated intravitreal injections on patients with neovascular AMD. Forty patients (16 males, 24 females) with neovascular AMD undergoing anti-VEGF treatment were recruited using purposive sampling from a private ophthalmology practice and public hospital in Melbourne. Patients were surveyed using the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ; Bradley, Health Psychology Research Unit, Surrey, England) and underwent semi-structured, one-on-one interviews. Interview topics were: treatment burden and satisfaction; tolerability; barriers to adherence; treatment motivation; and patient education. Interviews were audio recorded and thematic analysis performed using NVivo 10 (QSR International, Doncaster, Australia). Patients recognised the importance of treatment to preserve eyesight, yet experienced significant psychosocial and practical burden from the treatment schedule. Important issues included treatment-related anxiety, financial considerations and transport burden placed on relatives or carers. Many patients were restricted to sedentary activities post-injection owing to treatment side effects. Patients prioritised treatment, often sacrificing family, travel and social commitments owing to a fear of losing eyesight if treatment was not received. Whilst anti-VEGF injections represent the current mainstay of treatment for neovascular AMD, the ongoing treatment protocol imposes significant burden on patients. An understanding of the factors that contribute to the burden of treatment may help inform strategies to lessen its impact and assist patients to better manage the challenges of treatment.

Citing Articles

Efficacy, Safety, and Injection Frequency with Novel Aflibercept 8 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparison with Existing Anti-VEGF Regimens Using a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Wojciechowski P, Wdowiak M, Panek M, Lunk I, Carrasco J, Zhang X Ophthalmol Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 39994103 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-025-01098-y.


A Novel Optometry-Led Decision-Making Community Referral Refinement Scheme for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening.

Sanders F, John R, Jones P, Williams G Clin Optom (Auckl). 2024; 16:293-299.

PMID: 39563963 PMC: 11573688. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S470577.


Looking beyond the eyes of the patient: The importance of effective communication in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.

Scheffer M, Menting J, Rausch-Koster P, van Nispen R, van Dulmen S Acta Ophthalmol. 2024; 103(2):205-214.

PMID: 39450444 PMC: 11810561. DOI: 10.1111/aos.16777.


Faricimab versus bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Cost analysis based on real-world data from the Swedish Macula Registry.

Abdalla S, Westborg I, Pulkki-Brannstrom A, Norberg H Acta Ophthalmol. 2024; 103(1):99-108.

PMID: 39400438 PMC: 11704837. DOI: 10.1111/aos.16774.


Exploring new horizons in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: novel mechanisms of action and future therapeutic avenues.

Shirian J, Shukla P, Singh R Eye (Lond). 2024; 39(1):40-44.

PMID: 39379521 PMC: 11733175. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03373-x.