» Articles » PMID: 36751690

Individuals' Coping Styles and Levels of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Journal Sage Open
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2023 Feb 8
PMID 36751690
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the correlation between the coping styles and depression, anxiety, and stress levels of individuals living in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted using an online questionnaire (Socio-demographic Form; Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21; Coping Styles Scale) and it included 483 individuals. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Independent Samples -test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Hosmer-Lemeshow and Scheffe tests, Pearson Correlation, and Binary Logistic Regression analyzes were used to analyze the data. There was a negative correlation between the participants' self-confident and optimistic coping styles mean scores and their depression, anxiety, and stress mean scores. There was a positive correlation between the participants' helpless, submissive, and seeking social support coping styles mean scores and their depression, anxiety, and stress mean scores. The regression analysis revealed that using the helpless coping style increased the depression, anxiety, and stress levels of the participants while using the optimistic coping style and visiting a physician during the pandemic decreased them. In addition, seeking social support coping style increased the level of depression while the testing during the pandemic increased stress levels. As a result, it is recommended to strengthen society's psychological resilience and expand mental health support services for such mental illnesses.

Citing Articles

Network analysis of interactions of rumination and anxiety on smartphone dependence symptoms.

Zhang S, Yong S, Chen J Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1506721.

PMID: 39967579 PMC: 11832651. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1506721.


Distress and coping mechanisms among people with diabetes: cross-sectional assessment from an NCD screening clinic of a tertiary care hospital in North India.

Verma M, Sidana S, Kumar P, Singh O, Esht V, Balasubramanian K Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025; 17(1):34.

PMID: 39863869 PMC: 11762080. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-025-01603-0.


Psychological status and related factors of resident physicians during the release of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in China.

Zhang Q, Pan R, Pan Q, Qian Y, Zhou X, Chen Q Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1322742.

PMID: 38694979 PMC: 11061888. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322742.

References
1.
Killgore W, Cloonan S, Taylor E, Dailey N . Loneliness: A signature mental health concern in the era of COVID-19. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 290:113117. PMC: 7255345. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113117. View

2.
Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C . A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9). PMC: 7246819. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093165. View

3.
Hossain M, Tasnim S, Sultana A, Faizah F, Mazumder H, Zou L . Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: a review. F1000Res. 2020; 9:636. PMC: 7549174. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24457.1. View

4.
Lovibond P, LOVIBOND S . The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. View

5.
Alnazly E, Khraisat O, Al-Bashaireh A, Bryant C . Anxiety, depression, stress, fear and social support during COVID-19 pandemic among Jordanian healthcare workers. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0247679. PMC: 7954309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247679. View